Radeon Vega 7 vs GeForce4 420 Go

Place in the ranking	1519	530
Place by popularity	not in top-100	39
Power efficiency	no data	11.56
Architecture	Celsius (1999−2005)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code name	NV17 A5	Cezanne
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	6 February 2002 (22 years ago)	13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2	448
Core clock speed	200 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	190 MHz	1900 MHz
Number of transistors	29 million	9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.8	53.20
Floating-point processing power	no data	1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	8
TMUs	4	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 4x	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	32 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	200 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	3.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	8.0	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	1.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	-0−1	22
1440p	-0−1	28
4K	-0−1	20

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3
−72400%

1450−1500

+72400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −73233%	2200−2250 +73233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −72400%	1450−1500 +72400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −72400%	1450−1500 +72400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −73650%	2950−3000 +73650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −74275%	5950−6000 +74275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −73650%	2950−3000 +73650%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −74364%	20850−20900 +74364%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −73233%	2200−2250 +73233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −72400%	1450−1500 +72400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −72400%	1450−1500 +72400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −73650%	2950−3000 +73650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −74275%	5950−6000 +74275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −73650%	2950−3000 +73650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −74344%	6700−6750 +74344%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −74364%	20850−20900 +74364%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −73233%	2200−2250 +73233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −72400%	1450−1500 +72400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −72400%	1450−1500 +72400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −73650%	2950−3000 +73650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −74275%	5950−6000 +74275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −73650%	2950−3000 +73650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −74344%	6700−6750 +74344%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −74364%	20850−20900 +74364%