CMP 170HX vs GeForce2 MX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1527not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV11 A2GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 June 2000 (24 years ago)1 September 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4480
Core clock speed175 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors20 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate0.7394.8
Floating-point processing powerno data12.63 TFLOPS
ROPs2128
TMUs4280
Tensor Coresno data280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x4
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount32 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1458 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s1,493 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.0N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL1.2N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2000 1 September 2021
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 7 nm

CMP 170HX has an age advantage of 21 year, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX and CMP 170HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX is a desktop card while CMP 170HX is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 MX
GeForce2 MX
NVIDIA CMP 170HX
CMP 170HX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 17 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 17 votes

Rate CMP 170HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.