Radeon RX 7600S vs RX 6650M XT

Radeon RX 6600M Radeon RX 6600S Radeon RX 6650M Radeon RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6700S Radeon RX 6800S
VS
Radeon RX 7600M Radeon RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600S Radeon RX 7700S Radeon RX 7800M Radeon RX 7900M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6650M XT and Radeon RX 7600S, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6650M XT
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
38.20
+11.5%

RX 6650M XT outperforms RX 7600S by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX 6650M XT RX 6650M XT
RX 7600S RX 7600S

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking91121
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.3036.25
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 23Navi 33
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2022 (3 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481792
Core clock speed2068 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed2416 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate309.2246.4
Floating-point processing power9.896 TFLOPS15.77 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs128112
Ray Tracing Cores3228

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6650M XT 38.20
+11.5%
RX 7600S 34.25
  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6650M XT 17070
+11.5%
RX 7600S 15303

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+7.8%
102
−7.8%
1440p55−60
+3.8%
53
−3.8%
4K30−35
+11.1%
27
−11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 120−130
−33.6%
167
+33.6%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+9.5%
210−220
−9.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+14.1%
85−90
−14.1%
Atomic Heart 120−130
−0.8%
126
+0.8%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+7%
120−130
−7%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+20.4%
191
−20.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−6.2%
103
+6.2%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+14.4%
111
−14.4%
Fortnite 170−180
+9.3%
160−170
−9.3%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+11.3%
140−150
−11.3%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
−13.4%
144
+13.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+8.9%
140−150
−8.9%
Valorant 230−240
+7.8%
210−220
−7.8%
Atomic Heart 120−130
+73.6%
72
−73.6%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+7%
120−130
−7%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+81.1%
127
−81.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0.4%
270−280
−0.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+15.5%
84
−15.5%
Dota 2 140−150
+29.2%
113
−29.2%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+18.7%
107
−18.7%
Fortnite 170−180
+9.3%
160−170
−9.3%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+11.3%
140−150
−11.3%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
−6.3%
135
+6.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+5.6%
126
−5.6%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+154%
39
−154%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+8.9%
140−150
−8.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
−8.2%
159
+8.2%
Valorant 230−240
+7.8%
210−220
−7.8%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+7%
120−130
−7%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+38.6%
70
−38.6%
Dota 2 140−150
+32.7%
110
−32.7%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+24.5%
102
−24.5%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+11.3%
140−150
−11.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+8.9%
140−150
−8.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+54.7%
95
−54.7%
Valorant 230−240
+31.3%
179
−31.3%
Fortnite 170−180
+9.3%
160−170
−9.3%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+68.8%
64
−68.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
+11.8%
250−260
−11.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+13.5%
70−75
−13.5%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+15.1%
50−55
−15.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+6%
250−260
−6%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+9.5%
95−100
−9.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+14%
43
−14%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+12.5%
85−90
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+14.4%
100−110
−14.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+14.5%
65−70
−14.5%
Fortnite 110−120
+14.6%
95−100
−14.6%
Atomic Heart 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+188%
17
−188%
Grand Theft Auto V 90−95
+15.2%
75−80
−15.2%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+15.2%
30−35
−15.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+13.8%
55−60
−13.8%
Valorant 240−250
+11.2%
220−230
−11.2%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+13.8%
55−60
−13.8%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+14%
40−45
−14%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+22.2%
18
−22.2%
Dota 2 110−120
+7.5%
100−110
−7.5%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+14.6%
45−50
−14.6%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+15.9%
65−70
−15.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+20.8%
45−50
−20.8%
Fortnite 55−60
+17%
45−50
−17%

This is how RX 6650M XT and RX 7600S compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT is 8% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650M XT is 4% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650M XT is 11% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6650M XT is 188% faster.
  • in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 7600S is 34% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT is ahead in 56 tests (89%)
  • RX 7600S is ahead in 6 tests (10%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 38.20 34.25
Recency 4 January 2022 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 75 Watt

RX 6650M XT has a 11.5% higher aggregate performance score.

RX 7600S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6650M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7600S in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT
Radeon RX 6650M XT
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
Radeon RX 7600S
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6650M XT
vs
RX 6850M XT Radeon RX 6850M XT
RX 7600S Radeon RX 7600S
vs
RX 7700S Radeon RX 7700S
RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6650M XT
vs
RTX 4060 Mobile GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GTX 1050 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
vs
R9 390X2 R9 390X2
GeForce MX150 NVIDIA GeForce MX150
vs
RTX 3080 Mobile RTX 3080 Mobile
Quadro 5010M NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
vs
GMA 3100 GMA 3100
Vega 8 Efficient AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
vs
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
8400 GS PCI NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI
vs
ATI 9000 LE Radeon 9000 LE
ATI HD 4770 ATI Radeon HD 4770
vs
GeForce MX450 GeForce MX450
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
vs
Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU Max 30-Core GPU
8600 GS NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GS
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
ATI HD 3650 ATI Radeon HD 3650
vs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
Quadro P400 NVIDIA Quadro P400
vs
GT 730A GT 730A

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2
70 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2
231 vote

Rate Radeon RX 7600S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6650M XT or Radeon RX 7600S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.