Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 4070 Mobile
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
50.91
+342%

RTX 4070 Mobile outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS by a whopping 342% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking54416
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency30.3219.71
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)no data
GPU code nameAD106no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081536
Core clock speed1395 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1695 MHz1500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology4 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate244.1no data
Floating-point processing power15.62 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs144no data
Tensor Cores144no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHz8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4070 Mobile 50.91
+342%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 11.51

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4070 Mobile 41090
+482%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 7061

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 4070 Mobile 94245
+292%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 24058

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4070 Mobile 29950
+329%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 6982

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 4070 Mobile 11960
+501%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 1989

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130
+251%
37
−251%
1440p75
+369%
16−18
−369%
4K46
+360%
10−12
−360%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 133
+343%
30−33
−343%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
+352%
21−24
−352%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+388%
16−18
−388%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+380%
30−33
−380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+400%
18−20
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 116
+383%
24−27
−383%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+348%
21−24
−348%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+358%
24−27
−358%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+353%
45−50
−353%
Hitman 3 95−100
+362%
21−24
−362%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+355%
40−45
−355%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+360%
30−33
−360%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+376%
21−24
−376%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170−180
+386%
35−40
−386%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+353%
30−33
−353%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
+352%
21−24
−352%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+388%
16−18
−388%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+380%
30−33
−380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+400%
18−20
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+367%
21−24
−367%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+348%
21−24
−348%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+358%
24−27
−358%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+353%
45−50
−353%
Hitman 3 95−100
+362%
21−24
−362%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+355%
40−45
−355%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+360%
30−33
−360%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+376%
21−24
−376%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 233
+366%
50−55
−366%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+343%
21−24
−343%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+353%
30−33
−353%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
+352%
21−24
−352%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 101
+381%
21−24
−381%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+400%
18−20
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 87
+383%
18−20
−383%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+348%
21−24
−348%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+353%
45−50
−353%
Hitman 3 95−100
+362%
21−24
−362%
Horizon Zero Dawn 183
+358%
40−45
−358%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 204
+353%
45−50
−353%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116
+383%
24−27
−383%
Watch Dogs: Legion 89
+394%
18−20
−394%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+376%
21−24
−376%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+394%
18−20
−394%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+393%
14−16
−393%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75
+369%
16−18
−369%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+430%
10−11
−430%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+350%
12−14
−350%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+420%
10−11
−420%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+344%
55−60
−344%
Hitman 3 60−65
+400%
12−14
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 143
+377%
30−33
−377%
Metro Exodus 105
+400%
21−24
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 134
+347%
30−33
−347%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 88
+389%
18−20
−389%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+360%
45−50
−360%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+388%
16−18
−388%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+360%
10−11
−360%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+388%
8−9
−388%
Hitman 3 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+393%
40−45
−393%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+400%
12−14
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70
+400%
14−16
−400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+357%
7−8
−357%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+367%
9−10
−367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+360%
5−6
−360%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+357%
14−16
−357%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73
+356%
16−18
−356%
Watch Dogs: Legion 33
+371%
7−8
−371%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+356%
9−10
−356%

This is how RTX 4070 Mobile and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Mobile is 251% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Mobile is 369% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Mobile is 360% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 50.91 11.51
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 40 Watt

RTX 4070 Mobile has a 342.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, on the other hand, has 187.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1767 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 13 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.