Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 4060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4060 and Arc A750, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 4060
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
51.55
+65.8%

RTX 4060 outperforms Arc A750 by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking49176
Place by popularity2not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.0055.38
Power efficiency31.249.63
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameAD107DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 May 2023 (1 year ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 $289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4060 has 81% better value for money than Arc A750.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30723584
Core clock speed1830 MHz2050 MHz
Boost clock speed2460 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate236.2537.6
Floating-point processing power15.11 TFLOPS17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs48112
TMUs96224
Tensor Cores96448
Ray Tracing Cores2428

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length240 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2125 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth272.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4060 51.55
+65.8%
Arc A750 31.10

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4060 19887
+65.8%
Arc A750 11998

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4060 38191
+2.4%
Arc A750 37288

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 4060 107451
+8.7%
Arc A750 98837

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4060 28111
Arc A750 29667
+5.5%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4060 156140
+19.5%
Arc A750 130715

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4060 769721
+21.3%
Arc A750 634482

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD146
+32.7%
110
−32.7%
1440p74
+25.4%
59
−25.4%
4K46
+27.8%
36
−27.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.052.63
1440p4.044.90
4K6.508.03

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 139
+73.8%
80−85
−73.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
+71%
62
−71%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
−2.3%
90
+2.3%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+14.9%
140−150
−14.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+12.5%
85−90
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 107
+78.3%
60−65
−78.3%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+10.9%
90−95
−10.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+13.9%
100−110
−13.9%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+5.9%
200−210
−5.9%
Hitman 3 100−110
+14.9%
90−95
−14.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+11.8%
170−180
−11.8%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+2.1%
144
−2.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+8.1%
95−100
−8.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 190−200
+19.4%
160−170
−19.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+5.2%
130−140
−5.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
+0%
106
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
+15.8%
76
−15.8%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+14.9%
140−150
−14.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+12.5%
85−90
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
+80%
50−55
−80%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+10.9%
90−95
−10.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+13.9%
100−110
−13.9%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+5.9%
200−210
−5.9%
Hitman 3 100−110
+14.9%
90−95
−14.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+11.8%
170−180
−11.8%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+2.8%
143
−2.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+8.1%
95−100
−8.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 217
−10.1%
239
+10.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+15.4%
90−95
−15.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+5.2%
130−140
−5.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
+136%
45
−136%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
+27.5%
69
−27.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+12.5%
85−90
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 80
+77.8%
45−50
−77.8%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+10.9%
90−95
−10.9%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+138%
90
−138%
Hitman 3 100−110
+14.9%
90−95
−14.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+76.1%
113
−76.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 190
−4.7%
199
+4.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 112
+62.3%
69
−62.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+125%
63
−125%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+8.1%
95−100
−8.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+20.9%
85−90
−20.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+16.4%
65−70
−16.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+50%
38
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+11.1%
54
−11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+15.4%
50−55
−15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+15.7%
50−55
−15.7%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+8.8%
230−240
−8.8%
Hitman 3 70−75
+20.7%
55−60
−20.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+27.2%
92
−27.2%
Metro Exodus 111
+29.1%
86
−29.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
−12.4%
145
+12.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+42.1%
57
−42.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 210−220
+7.4%
200−210
−7.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+15.8%
75−80
−15.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+21.1%
35−40
−21.1%
Hitman 3 40−45
+16.7%
35−40
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+7.2%
190−200
−7.2%
Metro Exodus 70−75
−14.3%
80
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
−1.5%
69
+1.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+32.1%
28
−32.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+16.7%
30
−16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+20.7%
27−30
−20.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+23.1%
24−27
−23.1%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+21.3%
61
−21.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70
−20%
84
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−7.1%
30
+7.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%

This is how RTX 4060 and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 is 33% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 is 25% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 is 28% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4060 is 138% faster.
  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A750 is 20% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 is ahead in 57 tests (86%)
  • Arc A750 is ahead in 8 tests (12%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 51.55 31.10
Recency 18 May 2023 12 October 2022
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 225 Watt

RTX 4060 has a 65.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 95.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A750 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
Intel Arc A750
Arc A750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 17150 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 809 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.