Arc A580 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile with Arc A580, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3070 Mobile
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
37.20

Arc A580 outperforms RTX 3070 Mobile by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking11585
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data39.40
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)no data
GPU code nameGN20-E5 GA104DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2021 (3 years ago)10 October 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current priceno data$337

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51203072
Core clock speed780 - 1100 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1290 - 1620 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate287.0384.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A580 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3070 Mobile 37.20
Arc A580 41.42
+11.3%

Arc A580 outperforms GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile by 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3070 Mobile 14364
+24%
Arc A580 11584

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms Arc A580 by 24% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 3070 Mobile 33996
Arc A580 35210
+3.6%

Arc A580 outperforms GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile by 4% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 3070 Mobile 77148
Arc A580 95677
+24%

Arc A580 outperforms GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile by 24% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 3070 Mobile 25478
Arc A580 27574
+8.2%

Arc A580 outperforms GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile by 8% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 3070 Mobile 136558
+19.8%
Arc A580 113974

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms Arc A580 by 20% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RTX 3070 Mobile 510435
Arc A580 593548
+16.3%

Arc A580 outperforms GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile by 16% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD114
+15.2%
99
−15.2%
1440p75
+33.9%
56
−33.9%
4K48
+33.3%
36
−33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 119
−9.2%
130−140
+9.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 91 no data
Battlefield 5 120−130 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 107
−2.8%
110−120
+2.8%
Far Cry 5 80−85 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95 no data
Forza Horizon 4 189 no data
Hitman 3 114 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 199 no data
Metro Exodus 100−110 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 224 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 89 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76 no data
Battlefield 5 120−130 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 88
−8%
95−100
+8%
Far Cry 5 80−85 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95 no data
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 no data
Hitman 3 92 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160 no data
Metro Exodus 125 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 85 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 183 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 181 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 68 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 74
−8.1%
80−85
+8.1%
Far Cry 5 80−85 no data
Forza Horizon 4 167 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 132 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 168 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 94 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 60 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 82 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 123 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 56 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 47
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%
Far Cry 5 91 no data
Forza Horizon 4 140 no data
Hitman 3 68 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 112 no data
Metro Exodus 91 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 125 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 55 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 73 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 no data
Hitman 3 38 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 48 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 33 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 22
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 93 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 63 no data
Metro Exodus 58 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 27 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 44 no data

This is how RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A580 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 15% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 34% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 33% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.20 41.42
Recency 4 January 2021 10 October 2023
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 175 Watt

The Arc A580 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is a notebook card while Arc A580 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
Intel Arc A580
Arc A580

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1685 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 179 votes

Rate Arc A580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.