Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Place in the ranking	174	135
Place by popularity	67	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	7.15
Power efficiency	28.06	5.28
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GA106	Vega 20
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	12 January 2021 (4 years ago)	3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$4,399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	4096
Core clock speed	900 MHz	1400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1425 MHz	1720 MHz
Number of transistors	13,250 million	13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	475 Watt
Texture fill rate	171.0	440.3
Floating-point processing power	10.94 TFLOPS	14.09 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	64
TMUs	120	256
Tensor Cores	120	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	30	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	Apple MPX
Width	no data	Quad-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336.0 GB/s	1.02 TB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.6	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 Mobile 30.45

Pro Vega II Duo 34.01
+11.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3060 Mobile 12550

Pro Vega II Duo 14018
+11.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	99 −11.1%	110−120 +11.1%
1440p	65 −7.7%	70−75 +7.7%
4K	42 −7.1%	45−50 +7.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	39.99
1440p	no data	62.84
4K	no data	97.76

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −7.7%	70−75 +7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	103 −6.8%	110−120 +6.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −7.5%	100−105 +7.5%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −7.7%	70−75 +7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	81 −11.1%	90−95 +11.1%
Forza Horizon 4	195 −7.7%	210−220 +7.7%
Forza Horizon 5	115 −4.3%	120−130 +4.3%
Metro Exodus	94 −6.4%	100−105 +6.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −4.5%	70−75 +4.5%
Valorant	130−140 −7.7%	140−150 +7.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −7.5%	100−105 +7.5%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −7.7%	70−75 +7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	67 −4.5%	70−75 +4.5%
Dota 2	124 −4.8%	130−140 +4.8%
Far Cry 5	80 −6.3%	85−90 +6.3%
Fortnite	150−160 −6%	160−170 +6%
Forza Horizon 4	158 −7.6%	170−180 +7.6%
Forza Horizon 5	99 −11.1%	110−120 +11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	121 −7.4%	130−140 +7.4%
Metro Exodus	78 −9%	85−90 +9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 −8.7%	200−210 +8.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	56 −7.1%	60−65 +7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 −8.1%	120−130 +8.1%
Valorant	101 −8.9%	110−120 +8.9%
World of Tanks	270−280 −8.3%	300−310 +8.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −7.5%	100−105 +7.5%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −7.7%	70−75 +7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	59 −10.2%	65−70 +10.2%
Dota 2	124 −4.8%	130−140 +4.8%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −6.7%	95−100 +6.7%
Forza Horizon 4	140 −7.1%	150−160 +7.1%
Forza Horizon 5	81 −11.1%	90−95 +11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 −8.7%	200−210 +8.7%
Valorant	172 −10.5%	190−200 +10.5%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	75 −6.7%	80−85 +6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	75 −6.7%	80−85 +6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −8.6%	190−200 +8.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40 +0%	40−45 +0%
World of Tanks	210−220 −9.5%	230−240 +9.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −11.1%	70−75 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	37 −8.1%	40−45 +8.1%
Far Cry 5	121 −7.4%	130−140 +7.4%
Forza Horizon 4	101 −8.9%	110−120 +8.9%
Forza Horizon 5	63 −11.1%	70−75 +11.1%
Metro Exodus	85 −5.9%	90−95 +5.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −3.8%	55−60 +3.8%
Valorant	141 −6.4%	150−160 +6.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Dota 2	73 −9.6%	80−85 +9.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	73 −9.6%	80−85 +9.6%
Metro Exodus	31 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −6.8%	110−120 +6.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	22 −9.1%	24−27 +9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	73 −9.6%	80−85 +9.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −11.1%	40−45 +11.1%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 +0%	16−18 +0%
Dota 2	95 −5.3%	100−105 +5.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −8.7%	50−55 +8.7%
Fortnite	40−45 −4.7%	45−50 +4.7%
Forza Horizon 4	60 −8.3%	65−70 +8.3%
Forza Horizon 5	34 −2.9%	35−40 +2.9%
Valorant	62 −4.8%	65−70 +4.8%

This is how RTX 3060 Mobile and Pro Vega II Duo compete in popular games:

Pro Vega II Duo is 11% faster in 1080p
Pro Vega II Duo is 8% faster in 1440p
Pro Vega II Duo is 7% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	30.45	34.01
Recency	12 January 2021	3 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	475 Watt

RTX 3060 Mobile has an age advantage of 1 year, and 493.8% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega II Duo, on the other hand, has a 11.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.