Radeon Pro W6600 vs GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

Place in the ranking	207	99
Place by popularity	88	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	70.07
Power efficiency	24.43	28.22
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GA106	Navi 23
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	11 May 2021 (3 years ago)	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	1792
Core clock speed	735 MHz	2331 MHz
Boost clock speed	1035 MHz	2903 MHz
Number of transistors	13,250 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	82.80	325.1
Floating-point processing power	5.299 TFLOPS	10.4 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	64
TMUs	80	112
Tensor Cores	80	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	20	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
CUDA	8.6	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 26.29

Pro W6600 40.48
+54%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 10144

Pro W6600 15615
+53.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	74 −48.6%	110−120 +48.6%
1440p	44 −47.7%	65−70 +47.7%
4K	27 −48.1%	40−45 +48.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	5.90
1440p	no data	9.98
4K	no data	16.23

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

−53.2%

95−100
+53.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −45.5%	80−85 +45.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60 −50%	90−95 +50%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −46.3%	120−130 +46.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −47.1%	75−80 +47.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	59 −52.5%	90−95 +52.5%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −46.6%	85−90 +46.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −53.8%	100−105 +53.8%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −50.7%	220−230 +50.7%
Hitman 3	80 −50%	120−130 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −47.8%	170−180 +47.8%
Metro Exodus	143 −53.8%	220−230 +53.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	98 −53.1%	150−160 +53.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 −52.9%	130−140 +52.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	231 −51.5%	350−400 +51.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −45.5%	80−85 +45.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35 −42.9%	50−55 +42.9%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −46.3%	120−130 +46.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −47.1%	75−80 +47.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	45 −44.4%	65−70 +44.4%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −46.6%	85−90 +46.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −53.8%	100−105 +53.8%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −50.7%	220−230 +50.7%
Hitman 3	77 −42.9%	110−120 +42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −47.8%	170−180 +47.8%
Metro Exodus	114 −49.1%	170−180 +49.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	78 −53.8%	120−130 +53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	105 −52.4%	160−170 +52.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −48.1%	80−85 +48.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	203 −47.8%	300−310 +47.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −45.5%	80−85 +45.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	26 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −47.1%	75−80 +47.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 −50%	60−65 +50%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −46.6%	85−90 +46.6%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −50.7%	220−230 +50.7%
Hitman 3	67 −49.3%	100−105 +49.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	92 −52.2%	140−150 +52.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90 −44.4%	130−140 +44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50 −50%	75−80 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	28 −42.9%	40−45 +42.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

81
−48.1%

120−130

+48.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −48.9%	70−75 +48.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −44.7%	55−60 +44.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	26 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −42.9%	40−45 +42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	22 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −37.9%	40−45 +37.9%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −53.8%	220−230 +53.8%
Hitman 3	46 −52.2%	70−75 +52.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	69 −44.9%	100−105 +44.9%
Metro Exodus	60 −50%	90−95 +50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	61 −47.5%	90−95 +47.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −45.2%	45−50 +45.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	139 −51.1%	210−220 +51.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−51.8%

85−90
+51.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −40%	35−40 +40%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −42.1%	27−30 +42.1%
Hitman 3	20 −50%	30−33 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 −48.4%	190−200 +48.4%
Metro Exodus	47 −48.9%	70−75 +48.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	29 −37.9%	40−45 +37.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −40%	21−24 +40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 −40%	14−16 +40%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −47.1%	50−55 +47.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	34 −47.1%	50−55 +47.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10 −40%	14−16 +40%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−37.9%

40−45
+37.9%

This is how RTX 3050 Ti Mobile and Pro W6600 compete in popular games:

Pro W6600 is 49% faster in 1080p
Pro W6600 is 48% faster in 1440p
Pro W6600 is 48% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	26.29	40.48
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	100 Watt

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has 33.3% lower power consumption.

Pro W6600, on the other hand, has a 54% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon Pro W6600 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.