RTX A400 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile with RTX A400, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
2023
6 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
25.18
+78.2%

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms RTX A400 by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking217369
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.8919.45
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGN20-P0-R 6 GBGA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2023 (2 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560768
Core clock speed1237 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speed1492 MHz1762 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data42.29
Floating-point processing powerno data2.706 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24
Tensor Coresno data24
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD69
+97.1%
35−40
−97.1%
1440p37
+106%
18−21
−106%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+95.8%
24−27
−95.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+80%
45−50
−80%
Elden Ring 80−85
+84.4%
45−50
−84.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+92.5%
40−45
−92.5%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+95.8%
24−27
−95.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+100%
16−18
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 105
+90.9%
55−60
−90.9%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+88.6%
35−40
−88.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
Valorant 100−110
+83.6%
55−60
−83.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+92.5%
40−45
−92.5%
Counter-Strike 2 40
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Dota 2 61
+103%
30−33
−103%
Elden Ring 80−85
+84.4%
45−50
−84.4%
Far Cry 5 97
+94%
50−55
−94%
Fortnite 120−130
+80%
70−75
−80%
Forza Horizon 4 86
+91.1%
45−50
−91.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 91
+82%
50−55
−82%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+88.6%
35−40
−88.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+85.9%
85−90
−85.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+82.2%
45−50
−82.2%
Valorant 100−110
+83.6%
55−60
−83.6%
World of Tanks 250−260
+85%
140−150
−85%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+92.5%
40−45
−92.5%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+95.8%
24−27
−95.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+90%
10−11
−90%
Dota 2 85−90
+91.1%
45−50
−91.1%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+92.5%
40−45
−92.5%
Forza Horizon 4 76
+90%
40−45
−90%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+85.9%
85−90
−85.9%
Valorant 100−110
+83.6%
55−60
−83.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 40
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Elden Ring 40−45
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 40
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+84.2%
95−100
−84.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
World of Tanks 160−170
+84.4%
90−95
−84.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+88.9%
27−30
−88.9%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+85%
40−45
−85%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+90%
30−33
−90%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+90%
30−33
−90%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+106%
18−20
−106%
Valorant 65−70
+94.3%
35−40
−94.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Dota 2 40−45
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
Elden Ring 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+92.5%
40−45
−92.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Dota 2 40−45
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Fortnite 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Valorant 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%

This is how RTX 3050 6GB Mobile and RTX A400 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 97% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 106% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.18 14.13
Recency 6 January 2023 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile has a 78.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX A400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 20% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A400 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is a notebook card while RTX A400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 690 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 16 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.