Radeon 660M vs GeForce RTX 2080 Super

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 Super with Radeon 660M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2080 Super
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
50.76
+211%

RTX 2080 Super outperforms 660M by a whopping 211% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking56332
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation31.94no data
Power efficiency13.9227.95
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU104Rembrandt+
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 July 2019 (5 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072384
Core clock speed1650 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1815 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate348.545.60
Floating-point processing power11.15 TFLOPS1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs19224
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores486

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1937 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth495.9 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 Super 50.76
+211%
Radeon 660M 16.31

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2080 Super 19558
+211%
Radeon 660M 6285

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2080 Super 40963
+507%
Radeon 660M 6743

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2080 Super 27398
+465%
Radeon 660M 4848

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2080 Super 140388
+345%
Radeon 660M 31515

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2080 Super 515887
+82.2%
Radeon 660M 283076

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140
+460%
25
−460%
1440p97
+223%
30−35
−223%
4K68
+224%
21−24
−224%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.99no data
1440p7.21no data
4K10.28no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+288%
24
−288%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 99
+330%
21−24
−330%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 94
+262%
26
−262%
Battlefield 5 194
+547%
30−33
−547%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 127
+535%
20−22
−535%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+365%
20
−365%
Far Cry 5 141
+513%
21−24
−513%
Far Cry New Dawn 170
+530%
27−30
−530%
Forza Horizon 4 266
+309%
65−70
−309%
Hitman 3 113
+438%
21
−438%
Horizon Zero Dawn 301
+457%
50−55
−457%
Metro Exodus 144
+365%
30−35
−365%
Red Dead Redemption 2 122
+352%
27−30
−352%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 198
+519%
30−35
−519%
Watch Dogs: Legion 227
+266%
60−65
−266%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 142
+517%
21−24
−517%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
+316%
19
−316%
Battlefield 5 182
+507%
30−33
−507%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120
+500%
20−22
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+564%
14
−564%
Far Cry 5 112
+387%
21−24
−387%
Far Cry New Dawn 128
+374%
27−30
−374%
Forza Horizon 4 258
+297%
65−70
−297%
Hitman 3 116
+452%
21
−452%
Horizon Zero Dawn 283
+424%
50−55
−424%
Metro Exodus 144
+365%
30−35
−365%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100
+270%
27−30
−270%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 225
+582%
33
−582%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+304%
24−27
−304%
Watch Dogs: Legion 211
+240%
60−65
−240%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 68
+196%
21−24
−196%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70
+400%
14−16
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90
+350%
20−22
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 89
+493%
14−16
−493%
Far Cry 5 79
+243%
21−24
−243%
Forza Horizon 4 133
+105%
65−70
−105%
Hitman 3 108
+468%
18−20
−468%
Horizon Zero Dawn 162
+636%
22
−636%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 189
+600%
27
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+627%
15
−627%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75
+21%
60−65
−21%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 118
+337%
27−30
−337%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 134
+605%
18−20
−605%
Far Cry New Dawn 93
+520%
14−16
−520%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 58
+480%
10−11
−480%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 57
+850%
6−7
−850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65
+550%
10−11
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
+1040%
5−6
−1040%
Far Cry 5 70
+536%
10−12
−536%
Forza Horizon 4 249
+479%
40−45
−479%
Hitman 3 79
+508%
12−14
−508%
Horizon Zero Dawn 127
+535%
20−22
−535%
Metro Exodus 90
+543%
14−16
−543%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 141
+1075%
12−14
−1075%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+800%
9−10
−800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 211
+240%
60−65
−240%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 107
+569%
16−18
−569%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 62
+589%
9−10
−589%
Far Cry New Dawn 53
+657%
7−8
−657%
Hitman 3 40−45
+600%
6−7
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 131
+220%
40−45
−220%
Metro Exodus 89
+1013%
8−9
−1013%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+1029%
7−8
−1029%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41
+583%
6−7
−583%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 36
+800%
4−5
−800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 39
+875%
4−5
−875%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Far Cry 5 40
+700%
5−6
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 81
+575%
12−14
−575%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 82
+1267%
6−7
−1267%
Watch Dogs: Legion 34
+1033%
3−4
−1033%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60
+567%
9−10
−567%

This is how RTX 2080 Super and Radeon 660M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Super is 460% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Super is 223% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Super is 224% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2080 Super is 3000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2080 Super surpassed Radeon 660M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 50.76 16.31
Recency 23 July 2019 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 40 Watt

RTX 2080 Super has a 211.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 660M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 525% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 660M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Super is a desktop card while Radeon 660M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GeForce RTX 2080 Super
AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 2520 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 324 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.