RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

Place in the ranking	179	33
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	18.41	27.65
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	TU106	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	29 January 2019 (5 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	7424
Core clock speed	960 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	10,800 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	144.0	no data
Floating-point processing power	4.608 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	no data
TMUs	120	no data
Tensor Cores	240	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	30	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	7.5	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	101 −88.1%	190−200 +88.1%
1440p	60 −83.3%	110−120 +83.3%
4K	43 −86%	80−85 +86%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

45−50

−93.9%

95−100
+93.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	91 −86.8%	170−180 +86.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	71 −83.1%	130−140 +83.1%
Battlefield 5	119 −93.3%	230−240 +93.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	88 −93.2%	170−180 +93.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −93.9%	95−100 +93.9%
Far Cry 5	105 −90.5%	200−210 +90.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	110 −90.9%	210−220 +90.9%
Forza Horizon 4	366 −91.3%	700−750 +91.3%
Hitman 3	83 −92.8%	160−170 +92.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	223 −79.4%	400−450 +79.4%
Metro Exodus	130 −92.3%	250−260 +92.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100 −90%	190−200 +90%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	148 −95.9%	290−300 +95.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	227 −76.2%	400−450 +76.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	107 −86.9%	200−210 +86.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	56 −78.6%	100−105 +78.6%
Battlefield 5	105 −90.5%	200−210 +90.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	79 −89.9%	150−160 +89.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −93.9%	95−100 +93.9%
Far Cry 5	85 −88.2%	160−170 +88.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	82 −95.1%	160−170 +95.1%
Forza Horizon 4	280 −78.6%	500−550 +78.6%
Hitman 3	75 −86.7%	140−150 +86.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	196 −78.6%	350−400 +78.6%
Metro Exodus	112 −87.5%	210−220 +87.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75 −86.7%	140−150 +86.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	123 −95.1%	240−250 +95.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −93.5%	120−130 +93.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	190 −84.2%	350−400 +84.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50 −90%	95−100 +90%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	48 −87.5%	90−95 +87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	58 −89.7%	110−120 +89.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −93.9%	95−100 +93.9%
Far Cry 5	62 −93.5%	120−130 +93.5%
Forza Horizon 4	88 −93.2%	170−180 +93.2%
Hitman 3	66 −81.8%	120−130 +81.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	94 −91.5%	180−190 +91.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	107 −86.9%	200−210 +86.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60 −83.3%	110−120 +83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	38 −84.2%	70−75 +84.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

79
−89.9%

150−160

+89.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65 −84.6%	120−130 +84.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	54 −85.2%	100−105 +85.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40 −87.5%	75−80 +87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 −84.2%	70−75 +84.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	42 −90.5%	80−85 +90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −75%	35−40 +75%
Far Cry 5	42 −90.5%	80−85 +90.5%
Forza Horizon 4	246 −82.9%	450−500 +82.9%
Hitman 3	46 −95.7%	90−95 +95.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70 −85.7%	130−140 +85.7%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −78.6%	100−105 +78.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 −94%	130−140 +94%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −84.2%	70−75 +84.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	210 −90.5%	400−450 +90.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

62
−93.5%

120−130

+93.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	32 −87.5%	60−65 +87.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	30 −83.3%	55−60 +83.3%
Hitman 3	28 −78.6%	50−55 +78.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	86 −86%	160−170 +86%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −85.7%	65−70 +85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39 −92.3%	75−80 +92.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	25 −80%	45−50 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	22 −81.8%	40−45 +81.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20 −75%	35−40 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Far Cry 5	21 −90.5%	40−45 +90.5%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −87.5%	75−80 +87.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −84.2%	70−75 +84.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	15 −80%	27−30 +80%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−83.3%

55−60
+83.3%

This is how RTX 2060 Mobile and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 88% faster in 1080p
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 83% faster in 1440p
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 86% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	30.44	59.65
Recency	29 January 2019	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	150 Watt

RTX 2060 Mobile has 30.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 96% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.