RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q with RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2060 Max-Q
2020
6 GB GDDR6, 65 Watt
25.29

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX 2060 Max-Q by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking21035
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.1327.57
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU106no data
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date29 January 2020 (4 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19207424
Core clock speed975 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1185 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate142.2no data
Floating-point processing power4.55 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs120no data
Tensor Cores240no data
Ray Tracing Cores30no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB12 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth264.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 Max-Q 25.29
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 59.31
+135%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2060 Max-Q 9755
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 22878
+135%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD89
−125%
200−210
+125%
1440p44
−127%
100−110
+127%
4K45
−122%
100−110
+122%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−132%
95−100
+132%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 79
−128%
180−190
+128%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−133%
100−105
+133%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−129%
190−200
+129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 82
−132%
190−200
+132%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−132%
95−100
+132%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−124%
130−140
+124%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−127%
150−160
+127%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−104%
300−310
+104%
Hitman 3 50−55
−116%
110−120
+116%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−133%
270−280
+133%
Metro Exodus 143
−110%
300−310
+110%
Red Dead Redemption 2 93
−126%
210−220
+126%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
−133%
200−210
+133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−131%
240−250
+131%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
−118%
120−130
+118%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−133%
100−105
+133%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−129%
190−200
+129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75
−127%
170−180
+127%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−132%
95−100
+132%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−124%
130−140
+124%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−127%
150−160
+127%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−104%
300−310
+104%
Hitman 3 50−55
−116%
110−120
+116%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−133%
270−280
+133%
Metro Exodus 121
−131%
280−290
+131%
Red Dead Redemption 2 82
−132%
190−200
+132%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 106
−126%
240−250
+126%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−122%
120−130
+122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−131%
240−250
+131%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45
−122%
100−105
+122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−133%
100−105
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55
−118%
120−130
+118%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−132%
95−100
+132%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−124%
130−140
+124%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−104%
300−310
+104%
Hitman 3 50−55
−116%
110−120
+116%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−133%
270−280
+133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 93
−126%
210−220
+126%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
−128%
130−140
+128%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−131%
240−250
+131%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 78
−131%
180−190
+131%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−129%
110−120
+129%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−124%
85−90
+124%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−131%
60−65
+131%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−120%
55−60
+120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−124%
65−70
+124%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−124%
65−70
+124%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−108%
300−310
+108%
Hitman 3 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−131%
120−130
+131%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−129%
110−120
+129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−118%
120−130
+118%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−126%
70−75
+126%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−111%
300−310
+111%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−126%
95−100
+126%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−120%
55−60
+120%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Hitman 3 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−133%
300−310
+133%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−124%
65−70
+124%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
−129%
80−85
+129%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−129%
80−85
+129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−126%
70−75
+126%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%

This is how RTX 2060 Max-Q and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 125% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 127% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 122% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.29 59.31
Recency 29 January 2020 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 150 Watt

RTX 2060 Max-Q has 130.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 134.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 367 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.