Radeon X1650 SE vs GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking280not rated
Place by popularity30not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Ultra-Threaded SE
GPU code nameGN20-S7RV515
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 December 2021 (2 years ago)2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speedno data635 MHz
Boost clock speed1477 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data107 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30-45 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate189.12.540

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and Radeon X1650 SE compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.63.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.6no data

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 27 Watt

RTX 2050 Mobile has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1650 SE, on the other hand, has 11.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and Radeon X1650 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon X1650 SE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
ATI Radeon X1650 SE
Radeon X1650 SE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1694 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1650 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.