GeForce RTX 4090 vs RTX 2050 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile with GeForce RTX 4090, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2050 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 45 Watt
18.74

RTX 4090 outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by a whopping 434% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2981
Place by popularity176
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.56
Power efficiency28.6715.30
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA107AD102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 December 2021 (3 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204816384
Core clock speed1185 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed1477 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistorsno data76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate94.531,290
Floating-point processing power6.05 TFLOPS82.58 TFLOPS
ROPs32176
TMUs64512
Tensor Cores256512
Ray Tracing Cores32128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s1.01 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2050 Mobile 18.74
RTX 4090 100.00
+434%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2050 Mobile 12495
RTX 4090 104598
+737%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 2050 Mobile 46821
RTX 4090 137609
+194%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2050 Mobile 8965
RTX 4090 73447
+719%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2050 Mobile 58257
RTX 4090 260357
+347%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD42
−514%
258
+514%
1440p33
−497%
197
+497%
4K25
−472%
143
+472%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data6.20
1440pno data8.12
4Kno data11.18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
−489%
212
+489%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
−359%
225
+359%
Elden Ring 43
−479%
249
+479%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−95%
110−120
+95%
Counter-Strike 2 30
−617%
215
+617%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
−429%
111
+429%
Forza Horizon 4 76
−630%
555
+630%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−249%
178
+249%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−255%
150−160
+255%
Valorant 87
−849%
826
+849%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−95%
110−120
+95%
Counter-Strike 2 27
−637%
199
+637%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
−613%
107
+613%
Dota 2 85
−135%
200
+135%
Elden Ring 59
−693%
468
+693%
Far Cry 5 70
−113%
149
+113%
Fortnite 100−105
−208%
300−350
+208%
Forza Horizon 4 63
−770%
548
+770%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
−152%
174
+152%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−259%
183
+259%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−68%
210−220
+68%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−255%
150−160
+255%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−200%
170−180
+200%
Valorant 43
−1702%
750−800
+1702%
World of Tanks 220−230
−25.1%
270−280
+25.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−95%
110−120
+95%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−461%
185
+461%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−708%
105
+708%
Dota 2 110
−104%
224
+104%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−234%
210−220
+234%
Forza Horizon 4 56
−871%
544
+871%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−68%
210−220
+68%
Valorant 75−80
−795%
680
+795%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 37
−338%
162
+338%
Elden Ring 30−35
−1006%
343
+1006%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
−335%
161
+335%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−4.8%
170−180
+4.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−447%
90−95
+447%
World of Tanks 120−130
−303%
500−550
+303%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−129%
85−90
+129%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−850%
152
+850%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−413%
77
+413%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−227%
160−170
+227%
Forza Horizon 4 47
−979%
507
+979%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−262%
152
+262%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−948%
262
+948%
Valorant 45−50
−1092%
572
+1092%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−1007%
166
+1007%
Dota 2 30−35
−484%
187
+484%
Elden Ring 12−14
−1423%
198
+1423%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−484%
187
+484%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−879%
137
+879%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−273%
200−210
+273%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−433%
60−65
+433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−484%
187
+484%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−406%
90−95
+406%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−900%
150−160
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−700%
40
+700%
Dota 2 34
−568%
227
+568%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−338%
100−110
+338%
Fortnite 21−24
−336%
95−100
+336%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−952%
284
+952%
Valorant 21−24
−1555%
364
+1555%

This is how RTX 2050 Mobile and RTX 4090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 is 514% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 is 497% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 is 472% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4090 is 1702% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4090 surpassed RTX 2050 Mobile in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.74 100.00
Recency 17 December 2021 20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 450 Watt

RTX 2050 Mobile has 900% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090, on the other hand, has a 433.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2335 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15736 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.