RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs GeForce MX550

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX550 with RTX 5000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX550
2021
2 GB GDDR6, 25 Watt
11.78

RTX 5000 Ada Generation outperforms MX550 by a whopping 516% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking40516
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency32.5720.07
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU117SAD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 December 2021 (2 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102412800
Core clock speed1065 MHz1155 MHz
Boost clock speed1320 MHz2550 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate42.241,020
Floating-point processing power2.703 TFLOPS65.28 TFLOPS
ROPs16176
TMUs32400
Tensor Coresno data400
Ray Tracing Coresno data100

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA7.58.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX550 11.78
RTX 5000 Ada Generation 72.58
+516%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX550 4544
RTX 5000 Ada Generation 27999
+516%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
−509%
280−290
+509%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−507%
170−180
+507%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−505%
230−240
+505%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−483%
140−150
+483%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−493%
160−170
+493%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−506%
200−210
+506%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−477%
450−500
+477%
Hitman 3 21−24
−491%
130−140
+491%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−456%
350−400
+456%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−515%
240−250
+515%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−506%
200−210
+506%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−505%
230−240
+505%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−480%
400−450
+480%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−507%
170−180
+507%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−505%
230−240
+505%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−483%
140−150
+483%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−493%
160−170
+493%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−506%
200−210
+506%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−477%
450−500
+477%
Hitman 3 21−24
−491%
130−140
+491%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−456%
350−400
+456%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−515%
240−250
+515%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−506%
200−210
+506%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 52
−477%
300−310
+477%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−500%
180−190
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−480%
400−450
+480%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−507%
170−180
+507%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−483%
140−150
+483%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−493%
160−170
+493%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−477%
450−500
+477%
Hitman 3 21−24
−491%
130−140
+491%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−456%
350−400
+456%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 42
−495%
250−260
+495%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
−493%
160−170
+493%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−480%
400−450
+480%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−506%
200−210
+506%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−509%
140−150
+509%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−514%
350−400
+514%
Hitman 3 14−16
−500%
90−95
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−483%
140−150
+483%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−479%
110−120
+479%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−508%
450−500
+508%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−479%
110−120
+479%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−491%
65−70
+491%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Hitman 3 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−445%
300−310
+445%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−500%
90−95
+500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−491%
65−70
+491%

This is how GeForce MX550 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 509% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.78 72.58
Recency 17 December 2021 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 250 Watt

GeForce MX550 has 900% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 516.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX550 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX550 is a notebook card while RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX550
GeForce MX550
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 779 votes

Rate GeForce MX550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 75 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.