GeForce MX350 vs GTX 965M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 965M and GeForce MX350, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 965M
2016
2 GB GDDR5
9.86
+35.1%

GTX 965M outperforms MX350 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking456538
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.5125.01
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGM206SGP107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2016 (8 years ago)10 February 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024640
Core clock speed944 MHz747 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz937 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown20 Watt
Texture fill rate73.6029.98
Floating-point processing power2.355 TFLOPS1.199 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs6432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s56.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus++
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 965M 9.86
+35.1%
GeForce MX350 7.30

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 965M 3797
+35.1%
GeForce MX350 2811

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 965M 7322
+18.7%
GeForce MX350 6166

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 965M 5536
+26.7%
GeForce MX350 4371

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 965M 34748
+40.4%
GeForce MX350 24744

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 965M 14394
+6.7%
GeForce MX350 13490

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 965M 259766
GeForce MX350 285166
+9.8%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 965M 1810
+35.5%
GeForce MX350 1336

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 965M 16483
+18.4%
GeForce MX350 13921

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 965M 13861
+10.3%
GeForce MX350 12572

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45
+73.1%
26
−73.1%
1440p26
−19.2%
31
+19.2%
4K20
−25%
25
+25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
+40.9%
22
−40.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+15.4%
13
−15.4%
Battlefield 5 49
+133%
21−24
−133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+5.3%
19
−5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−13%
26
+13%
Far Cry New Dawn 40
+14.3%
35
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+35.4%
45−50
−35.4%
Hitman 3 18−20
−5.3%
20
+5.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−139%
129
+139%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−19.4%
37
+19.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45
+40.6%
32
−40.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 69
+188%
24−27
−188%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−50.8%
95
+50.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41
+57.7%
26
−57.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+150%
6
−150%
Battlefield 5 37
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+17.6%
17
−17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
23
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 29
+16%
25
−16%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+35.4%
45−50
−35.4%
Hitman 3 18−20
−5.3%
20
+5.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−115%
116
+115%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+10.7%
28
−10.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+37.5%
24
−37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+28%
25
−28%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
+291%
21−24
−291%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−39.7%
88
+39.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13
+62.5%
8
−62.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+233%
6
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+53.3%
15
−53.3%
Forza Horizon 4 28
+47.4%
19
−47.4%
Hitman 3 18−20
+11.8%
17
−11.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 23
+15%
20
−15%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+68.4%
19
−68.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+12.5%
16
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+950%
6
−950%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 32
+60%
20
−60%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+65.4%
24−27
−65.4%
Hitman 3 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18
+20%
14−16
−20%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+34.8%
45−50
−34.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21
+75%
12−14
−75%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Hitman 3 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+225%
4−5
−225%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 14
+75%
8−9
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

This is how GTX 965M and GeForce MX350 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 965M is 73% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX350 is 19% faster in 1440p
  • GeForce MX350 is 25% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 965M is 950% faster.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX350 is 139% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 965M is ahead in 61 test (85%)
  • GeForce MX350 is ahead in 9 tests (13%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.86 7.30
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

GTX 965M has a 35.1% higher aggregate performance score.

GeForce MX350, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 965M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GeForce GTX 965M
NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GeForce MX350

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 109 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1626 votes

Rate GeForce MX350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.