GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs GTX 965M SLI

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 965M SLI and GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 965M SLI
2015
2x 4 GB GDDR5
17.34

RTX 2080 Max-Q outperforms GTX 965M SLI by a whopping 108% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking310131
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data31.17
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU104B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2015 (9 years ago)29 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482944
Core clock speed924 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1095 MHz
Number of transistors2x 5200 Million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data80 Watt
Texture fill rateno data201.5
Floating-point processing powerno data6.447 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data184
Tensor Coresno data368
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 965M SLI 17.34
RTX 2080 Max-Q 36.01
+108%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 965M SLI 14428
RTX 2080 Max-Q 27973
+93.9%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 965M SLI 10207
RTX 2080 Max-Q 20703
+103%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 965M SLI 51182
RTX 2080 Max-Q 117764
+130%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 965M SLI 250259
RTX 2080 Max-Q 425550
+70%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD71
−59.2%
113
+59.2%
1440p35−40
−111%
74
+111%
4K24−27
−121%
53
+121%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−130%
60−65
+130%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−108%
81
+108%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−114%
60−65
+114%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−149%
142
+149%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−171%
95
+171%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−130%
60−65
+130%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−193%
117
+193%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−196%
139
+196%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−146%
271
+146%
Hitman 3 30−35
−130%
75−80
+130%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−77.9%
150−160
+77.9%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−132%
137
+132%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−102%
95
+102%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−205%
174
+205%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−45.9%
120−130
+45.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−97.4%
75−80
+97.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−114%
60−65
+114%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−128%
130
+128%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−163%
92
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−130%
60−65
+130%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−125%
90
+125%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−117%
102
+117%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−103%
223
+103%
Hitman 3 30−35
−130%
75−80
+130%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−77.9%
150−160
+77.9%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−103%
120
+103%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−36.2%
64
+36.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−126%
120−130
+126%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−87.5%
75−80
+87.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−45.9%
120−130
+45.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−43.6%
56
+43.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−114%
60−65
+114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−103%
71
+103%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−130%
60−65
+130%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−67.5%
67
+67.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−66.4%
180−190
+66.4%
Hitman 3 30−35
−130%
75−80
+130%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−77.9%
150−160
+77.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−126%
120−130
+126%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−95%
78
+95%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−45.9%
120−130
+45.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−74.5%
82
+74.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−167%
88
+167%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−165%
69
+165%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−176%
47
+176%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−160%
35−40
+160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−121%
40−45
+121%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−155%
51
+155%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−138%
224
+138%
Hitman 3 20−22
−130%
45−50
+130%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−120%
75−80
+120%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−119%
65−70
+119%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−161%
85−90
+161%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−168%
50−55
+168%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−75%
180−190
+75%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−121%
60−65
+121%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−141%
41
+141%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−208%
40
+208%
Hitman 3 12−14
−123%
27−30
+123%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−93.3%
170−180
+93.3%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−100%
36
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−212%
53
+212%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−210%
31
+210%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−200%
27
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−167%
45−50
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−113%
30−35
+113%

This is how GTX 965M SLI and RTX 2080 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Max-Q is 59% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Max-Q is 111% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Max-Q is 121% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2080 Max-Q is 267% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2080 Max-Q surpassed GTX 965M SLI in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.34 36.01
Recency 5 January 2015 29 January 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

RTX 2080 Max-Q has a 107.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 965M SLI in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
GeForce GTX 965M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 185 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.