Quadro K3100M vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI

Place in the ranking	396	590
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.23
Power efficiency	7.18	5.41
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	no data	GK104
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	12 March 2014 (10 years ago)	23 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	768
Core clock speed	1029 MHz	706 MHz
Number of transistors	2x 1870 Million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	45.18
Floating-point processing power	no data	1.084 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	no data	MXM-B (3.0)
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2x 4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	2x 128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	102.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	No outputs
Display Port	no data	1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	+
3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (FL 11_0)	12
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.5
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	+
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 860M SLI 12.46
+112%

K3100M 5.87

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 860M SLI 9840
+175%

K3100M 3581

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 860M SLI 27223
+80%

K3100M 15120

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 860M SLI 5941
+112%

K3100M 2797

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 860M SLI 41434
+125%

K3100M 18389

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GTX 860M SLI 83
+131%

K3100M 36

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45 +40.6%	32 −40.6%
4K	30−35 +100%	15 −100%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	62.47
4K	no data	133.27

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20
+90%

10−11

−90%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +93.3%	14−16 −93.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 +186%	7−8 −186%
Battlefield 5	40−45 +150%	16−18 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +108%	12−14 −108%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +90%	10−11 −90%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +123%	12−14 −123%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +113%	16−18 −113%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +116%	35−40 −116%
Hitman 3	21−24 +91.7%	12−14 −91.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +83.3%	35−40 −83.3%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +173%	14−16 −173%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +113%	16−18 −113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +100%	20−22 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +44.9%	45−50 −44.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +93.3%	14−16 −93.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 +186%	7−8 −186%
Battlefield 5	40−45 +150%	16−18 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +108%	12−14 −108%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +90%	10−11 −90%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +123%	12−14 −123%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +113%	16−18 −113%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +116%	35−40 −116%
Hitman 3	21−24 +91.7%	12−14 −91.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +83.3%	35−40 −83.3%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +173%	14−16 −173%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +113%	16−18 −113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +100%	20−22 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −48.4%	46 +48.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +44.9%	45−50 −44.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +93.3%	14−16 −93.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 +186%	7−8 −186%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +108%	12−14 −108%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +90%	10−11 −90%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +123%	12−14 −123%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +116%	35−40 −116%
Hitman 3	21−24 +91.7%	12−14 −91.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +83.3%	35−40 −83.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +100%	20−22 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +343%	7 −343%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +44.9%	45−50 −44.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+113%

16−18

−113%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +118%	10−12 −118%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +259%	16−18 −259%
Hitman 3	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +92.3%	12−14 −92.3%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +1900%	1−2 −1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +111%	35−40 −111%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20−22
+100%

10−11

−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Hitman 3	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +354%	12−14 −354%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +120%	5 −120%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12
+83.3%

6−7

−83.3%

This is how GTX 860M SLI and K3100M compete in popular games:

GTX 860M SLI is 41% faster in 1080p
GTX 860M SLI is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 860M SLI is 1900% faster.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the K3100M is 48% faster.

All in all, in popular games: