GeForce4 MX 4000 vs GeForce GTX 470

Place in the ranking	521	1515
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.30	no data
Power efficiency	2.59	no data
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code name	GF100	NV18 A4
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	26 March 2010 (14 years ago)	14 December 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$349	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	448	no data
Core clock speed	607 MHz	250 MHz
Number of transistors	3,100 million	29 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	215 Watt	no data
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	34.05	1.000
Floating-point processing power	1.089 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	40	2
TMUs	56	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	16x PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	AGP 8x
Length	241 mm	168 mm
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	1280 MB	128 MB
Memory bus width	320 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1674 MHz (3348 data rate)	166 MHz
Memory bandwidth	133.9 GB/s	2.656 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI	1x VGA
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	8.0
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.2	1.3
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 470 7.73
+77200%

GeForce4 MX 4000 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 470 3114
+77750%

GeForce4 MX 4000 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	55	-0−1
Full HD	63	-0−1
1200p	53	-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p

5.54

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	14−16	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	30−35	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	18−20	0−1
Metro Exodus	21−24	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24	0−1
Valorant	30−33	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	14−16	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18	0−1
Dota 2	27−30	0−1
Far Cry 5	35−40	0−1
Fortnite	45−50	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	30−35	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	18−20	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30	0−1
Metro Exodus	21−24	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27	0−1
Valorant	30−33	0−1
World of Tanks	120−130	0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	14−16	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18	0−1
Dota 2	64	0−1
Far Cry 5	35−40	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	30−35	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	18−20	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65	0−1
Valorant	30−33	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	10−11	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	10−11	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8	0−1
World of Tanks	55−60	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8	0−1
Far Cry 5	16−18	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	16−18	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	12−14	0−1
Metro Exodus	12−14	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12	0−1
Valorant	20−22	0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11	0−1
Dota 2	18−20	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20	0−1
Metro Exodus	4−5	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10−11	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Dota 2	18−20	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−11	0−1
Fortnite	8−9	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	10−11	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	5−6	0−1
Valorant	8−9	0−1

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.73	0.01
Recency	26 March 2010	14 December 2003
Maximum RAM amount	1280 MB	128 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	150 nm

GTX 470 has a 77200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 470 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 MX 4000 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.