Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition with Radeon Pro Vega 64X, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780M Mac Edition
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 122 Watt
6.70

Pro Vega 64X outperforms GTX 780M Mac Edition by a whopping 430% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking559140
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK104Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date8 November 2013 (10 years ago)19 March 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15364096
Core clock speed771 MHz1250 MHz
Boost clock speed797 MHz1468 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate102.0375.8
Floating-point processing power2.448 gflops12.03 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthMXM Moduleno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.125
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.70 35.54
Recency 8 November 2013 19 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 780M Mac Edition has 104.9% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega 64X, on the other hand, has a 430.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition is a desktop card while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 7 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 33 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.