GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs GTX 780 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 780 6 GB GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Ti GTX 780 Ti 6 GB GTX TITAN BLACK GTX TITAN Z
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX 2060 TU104 RTX 2070 Super RTX 2080 RTX 2080 Engineering Sample RTX 2080 Super

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and GeForce RTX 2070 Super, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
10.44

RTX 2070 Super outperforms GTX 780 Rev. 2 by a whopping 348% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Rev. 2
RTX 2070 Super RTX 2070 Super

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking44173
Place by popularitynot in top-10097
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.2440.86
Power efficiency2.9215.18
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK110BTU104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 September 2013 (11 years ago)9 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX 2070 Super has 3195% better value for money than GTX 780 Rev. 2.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042560
Core clock speed863 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt215 Watt
Texture fill rate173.2283.2
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPS9.062 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs192160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI++
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.57.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−353%
136
+353%
1440p16−18
−400%
80
+400%
4K10−12
−430%
53
+430%

Cost per frame, $

1080p21.63
−490%
3.67
+490%
1440p40.56
−550%
6.24
+550%
4K64.90
−589%
9.42
+589%
  • RTX 2070 Super has 490% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super has 550% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super has 589% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 195
+0%
195
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 117
+0%
117
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 94
+0%
94
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 147
+0%
147
+0%
Battlefield 5 118
+0%
118
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 84
+0%
84
+0%
Far Cry 5 123
+0%
123
+0%
Fortnite 218
+0%
218
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 174
+0%
174
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 186
+0%
186
+0%
Valorant 279
+0%
279
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 86
+0%
86
+0%
Battlefield 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 84
+0%
84
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Dota 2 137
+0%
137
+0%
Far Cry 5 117
+0%
117
+0%
Fortnite 193
+0%
193
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 172
+0%
172
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+0%
145
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 165
+0%
165
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181
+0%
181
+0%
Valorant 270
+0%
270
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95
+0%
95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 78
+0%
78
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 73
+0%
73
+0%
Dota 2 129
+0%
129
+0%
Far Cry 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 153
+0%
153
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 154
+0%
154
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+0%
100
+0%
Valorant 194
+0%
194
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 168
+0%
168
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 95
+0%
95
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 263
+0%
263
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+0%
47
+0%
Far Cry 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 125
+0%
125
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 117
+0%
117
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 93
+0%
93
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+0%
68
+0%
Valorant 258
+0%
258
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12
+0%
12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Dota 2 128
+0%
128
+0%
Far Cry 5 54
+0%
54
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 84
+0%
84
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 66
+0%
66
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 58
+0%
58
+0%

This is how GTX 780 Rev. 2 and RTX 2070 Super compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super is 353% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super is 400% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super is 430% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.44 46.78
Recency 10 September 2013 9 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 215 Watt

RTX 2070 Super has a 348.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 16.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RX 460 Radeon RX 460
RTX 2070 Super GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
GTX 1080 Ti GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
R7 265 Radeon R7 265
RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB
vs
GTX 750 750
GTX 750 GeForce GTX 750
vs
Arc B580 Arc B580
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
vs
R9 M375 R9 M375
GTX 760 Ti OEM GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 1050 Ti Max-Q
GTX 760 Ti OEM GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q 1050 Max-Q
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile
GTX 760 OEM Rebrand GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
vs
Tesla M40 Tesla M40
GTX 770 GeForce GTX 770
vs
7025 + nForce 630a GeForce 7025 + nForce 630a
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
HD 7500G HD 7500G
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
Arc 7 A780 7 A780

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 5169 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 or GeForce RTX 2070 Super, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.