Tesla M40 vs GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data7.50
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGK104GM200
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 August 2013 (11 years ago)10 November 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11523072
Core clock speed823 MHz948 MHz
Boost clock speed888 MHz1112 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate85.25213.5
Floating-point processing power2.046 TFLOPS6.832 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs96192

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s288.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.05.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 August 2013 10 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 12 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 760 OEM Rebrand has 92.3% lower power consumption.

Tesla M40, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand and Tesla M40. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand is a desktop card while Tesla M40 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
NVIDIA Tesla M40
Tesla M40

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 87 votes

Rate Tesla M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.