Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce GTX 780 6 GB

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated360
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.74
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGK110BNavi 14
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 September 2013 (11 years ago)7 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041408
Core clock speed863 MHz1375 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHz1645 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate173.2144.8
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPS4.632 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs19288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 September 2013 7 October 2019
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 85 Watt

GTX 780 6 GB has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 5500M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 194.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 780 6 GB and Radeon RX 5500M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 6 GB is a desktop card while Radeon RX 5500M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
AMD Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 14 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 351 vote

Rate Radeon RX 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.