Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 770M SLI and Radeon RX 5500M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 770M SLI
2013
2x 3 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
14.40
+0.4%

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking363366
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 14
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)7 October 2019 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19201408
Core clock speed811 MHz1375 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1645 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2540 Million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rateno data144.8
Floating-point processing powerno data4.632 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 3 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2x 192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770M SLI 14.40
+0.4%
RX 5500M 14.34

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 770M SLI 9569
RX 5500M 16476
+72.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−60
−5.5%
58
+5.5%
1440p55−60
−3.6%
57
+3.6%
4K27−30
−7.4%
29
+7.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−150%
55
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−30.3%
43
+30.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−143%
56
+143%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−82.8%
53
+82.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−95.5%
43
+95.5%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3%
30−35
−3%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+2.6%
35−40
−2.6%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
Hitman 3 27−30
−115%
58
+115%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−97.3%
146
+97.3%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−42.5%
57
+42.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−122%
169
+122%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−13%
26
+13%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+38.2%
34
−38.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−65.5%
48
+65.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−50%
33
+50%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3%
30−35
−3%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+2.6%
35−40
−2.6%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
Hitman 3 27−30
−115%
58
+115%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−94.6%
144
+94.6%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+36.1%
36
−36.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−30%
52
+30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−74.5%
82
+74.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+2.9%
30−35
−2.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−121%
168
+121%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+6.5%
31
−6.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+64.3%
14
−64.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+11.5%
26
−11.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−36.4%
30
+36.4%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3%
30−35
−3%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
Hitman 3 27−30
−85.2%
50
+85.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+7.2%
69
−7.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−53.2%
72
+53.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−28.6%
45
+28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+245%
22
−245%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−35%
54
+35%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−92.9%
54
+92.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+10%
10
−10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
Hitman 3 16−18
−94.1%
33
+94.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−89.7%
55
+89.7%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−88%
47
+88%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−83.1%
163
+83.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−66.7%
40
+66.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−107%
29
+107%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Hitman 3 10−11
+11.1%
9
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+9.2%
65
−9.2%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−100%
28
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−53.8%
20
+53.8%

This is how GTX 770M SLI and RX 5500M compete in popular games:

  • RX 5500M is 5% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5500M is 4% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5500M is 7% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 770M SLI is 245% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 5500M is 150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 770M SLI is ahead in 26 tests (36%)
  • RX 5500M is ahead in 31 test (43%)
  • there's a draw in 15 tests (21%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.40 14.34
Recency 30 May 2013 7 October 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 85 Watt

GTX 770M SLI has a 0.4% higher aggregate performance score.

RX 5500M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 76.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 770M SLI and Radeon RX 5500M.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M SLI
GeForce GTX 770M SLI
AMD Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 350 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.