Radeon RX 6600 XT vs GeForce GTX 760M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 760M with Radeon RX 6600 XT, including specs and performance data.

GTX 760M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
4.46

RX 6600 XT outperforms GTX 760M by a whopping 861% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking66491
Place by popularitynot in top-10093
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data63.01
Power efficiency5.5618.37
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK106Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)30 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed657 MHz1968 MHz
Boost clock speed657 MHz2589 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate42.05331.4
Floating-point processing power1.009 TFLOPS10.6 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs64128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI++
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760M 4.46
RX 6600 XT 42.87
+861%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 760M 1720
RX 6600 XT 16519
+860%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 760M 3369
RX 6600 XT 39051
+1059%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 760M 14007
RX 6600 XT 88163
+529%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 760M 2271
RX 6600 XT 28342
+1148%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 760M 15900
RX 6600 XT 156297
+883%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p41
−754%
350−400
+754%
Full HD44
−207%
135
+207%
1440p7−8
−971%
75
+971%
4K4−5
−1000%
44
+1000%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.81
1440pno data5.05
4Kno data8.61

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−888%
79
+888%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−650%
90−95
+650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−3125%
129
+3125%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−1145%
130−140
+1145%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−760%
85−90
+760%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−875%
78
+875%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−911%
90−95
+911%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−775%
100−110
+775%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−637%
190−200
+637%
Hitman 3 10−11
−980%
108
+980%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−480%
170−180
+480%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−1230%
130−140
+1230%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−708%
95−100
+708%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−894%
150−160
+894%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−202%
130−140
+202%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−650%
90−95
+650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−2550%
106
+2550%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−1145%
130−140
+1145%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−760%
85−90
+760%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−850%
76
+850%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−911%
90−95
+911%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−775%
100−110
+775%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−637%
190−200
+637%
Hitman 3 10−11
−980%
108
+980%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−480%
170−180
+480%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−1230%
130−140
+1230%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−708%
95−100
+708%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1206%
209
+1206%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−418%
85−90
+418%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−202%
130−140
+202%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−650%
90−95
+650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1775%
75
+1775%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−760%
85−90
+760%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−763%
69
+763%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−911%
90−95
+911%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−637%
190−200
+637%
Hitman 3 10−11
−900%
100
+900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−423%
157
+423%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1044%
183
+1044%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−482%
99
+482%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−38.6%
61
+38.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−708%
95−100
+708%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−938%
80−85
+938%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1075%
45−50
+1075%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40
+1900%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−880%
45−50
+880%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−2838%
230−240
+2838%
Hitman 3 9−10
−644%
67
+644%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−1060%
116
+1060%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−9700%
98
+9700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−2033%
60−65
+2033%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−621%
200−210
+621%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−825%
70−75
+825%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1333%
40−45
+1333%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1133%
35−40
+1133%
Hitman 3 1−2
−3200%
33
+3200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−6267%
190−200
+6267%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−5500%
55−60
+5500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 54

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1300%
28
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 14
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2300%
24
+2300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−680%
35−40
+680%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 56
+0%
56
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 118
+0%
118
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 61
+0%
61
+0%

This is how GTX 760M and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is 754% faster in 900p
  • RX 6600 XT is 207% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 XT is 971% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 XT is 1000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 9700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is ahead in 67 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.46 42.87
Recency 30 May 2013 30 July 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 160 Watt

GTX 760M has 190.9% lower power consumption.

RX 6600 XT, on the other hand, has a 861.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 760M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GeForce GTX 760M
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 100 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4340 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.