NVIDIA started GeForce GTX 760M sales 30 May 2013. This is a Kepler architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use. 2 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 2 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 64.0 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is a graphics card attached via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. Power consumption is at 55 Watt.

Primary details

Some basic facts about GeForce GTX 760M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in the ranking	664
Place by popularity	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.57	of 100.00 (Radeon 890M)
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GK106
Market segment	Laptop
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

GeForce GTX 760M's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce GTX 760M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	of 21760 (GeForce RTX 5090)
Core clock speed	657 MHz	of 2670 MHz (Arc B580)
Boost clock speed	657 MHz	of 3599 MHz (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors	2,540 million	of 208,000 million (B200 SXM 192 GB)
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	of 3 nm (Arc Graphics 140V)
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	of 2400 Watt (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate	42.05	of 2,554 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Floating-point processing power	1.009 TFLOPS	of 109.7 (GeForce RTX 5090)
ROPs	16	of 192 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX)
TMUs	64	of 1280 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)

Form factor & compatibility

This section provides details about the physical dimensions of GeForce GTX 760M and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
SLI options	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of memory installed on GeForce GTX 760M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	of 294912 (Radeon Instinct MI325X)
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5
Memory bus width	128 Bit	of 8192 Bit (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	of 20000 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile)
Memory bandwidth	64.0 GB/s	of 5,171 GB/s (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Shared memory	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce GTX 760M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display Connectors	No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160
HDMI	+
HDCP content protection	+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+

Supported technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce GTX 760M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+
Optimus	+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	+

API compatibility

APIs supported by GeForce GTX 760M, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX	12 API
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	of 4.6 (GeForce RTX 4090)
OpenCL	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	+

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of GeForce GTX 760M. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760M 4.47

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 760M 1720

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 760M 3369

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 760M 14007

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 760M 2271

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 760M 15900

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 760M 5605

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

GTX 760M 4868

GeekBench 5 CUDA

GTX 760M 4287

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GTX 760M 33

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 760M 17

Gaming performance

Let's see how good GeForce GTX 760M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

900p	41
Full HD	44

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8−9

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5
Battlefield 5	10−12
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9
Far Cry 5	9−10
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14
Forza Horizon 4	27−30
Hitman 3	10−11
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33
Metro Exodus	10−11
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5
Battlefield 5	10−12
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9
Far Cry 5	9−10
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14
Forza Horizon 4	27−30
Hitman 3	10−11
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33
Metro Exodus	10−11
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9
Far Cry 5	9−10
Forza Horizon 4	27−30
Hitman 3	10−11
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3
Far Cry 5	5−6
Forza Horizon 4	8−9
Hitman 3	9−10
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11
Metro Exodus	1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4
Hitman 3	1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4
Metro Exodus	1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3
Forza Horizon 4	3−4
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

Closest competitors

GeForce GTX 760M's performance relative to its closest rivals among notebook graphics cards.

GeForce GTX 670M 102.01

Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 100.89

Iris Plus Graphics 655 100.45

GeForce GTX 760M 100

Iris Plus Graphics 645 99.78

Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 99.11

GeForce GT 755M 97.99

AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to GeForce GTX 760M is Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), which is faster by 1% and higher by 4 positions in our ranking.