Radeon Instinct MI250X vs GeForce GTX 680M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking496not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.49no data
Power efficiency5.81no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameGK104Aldebaran
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 June 2012 (12 years ago)8 November 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$310.50 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores134414080
Core clock speed719 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate84.901,496
Floating-point processing power2.038 TFLOPS47.87 TFLOPS
ROPs32no data
TMUs112880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s3,277 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 APIN/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.5N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2012 8 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 500 Watt

GTX 680M has 400% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI250X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 680M and Radeon Instinct MI250X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 680M is a notebook card while Radeon Instinct MI250X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
GeForce GTX 680M
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
Radeon Instinct MI250X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 45 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 123 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI250X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.