Radeon 620 vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 680M SLI and Radeon 620, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 680M SLI
2012
2x 4 GB GDDR5
16.63
+617%

GTX 680M SLI outperforms 620 by a whopping 617% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking325850
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.24
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameN13E-GTXPolaris 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2012 (12 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2688384
Core clock speed720 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data24.58
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed3600 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p133
+639%
18−20
−639%
Full HD98
+717%
12−14
−717%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+1700%
3−4
−1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+875%
4−5
−875%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+650%
6−7
−650%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+855%
10−12
−855%
Hitman 3 30−35
+357%
7−8
−357%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+332%
18−20
−332%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+391%
10−12
−391%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+122%
35−40
−122%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+1700%
3−4
−1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+875%
4−5
−875%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+650%
6−7
−650%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+855%
10−12
−855%
Hitman 3 30−35
+357%
7−8
−357%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+332%
18−20
−332%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+391%
10−12
−391%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+122%
35−40
−122%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+875%
4−5
−875%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+855%
10−12
−855%
Hitman 3 30−35
+357%
7−8
−357%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+332%
18−20
−332%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+391%
10−12
−391%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+122%
35−40
−122%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+633%
12−14
−633%
Hitman 3 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−105
+669%
12−14
−669%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Hitman 3 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+740%
10−11
−740%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%

This is how GTX 680M SLI and Radeon 620 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 680M SLI is 639% faster in 900p
  • GTX 680M SLI is 717% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 680M SLI is 5500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 680M SLI surpassed Radeon 620 in all 56 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.63 2.32
Recency 4 June 2012 13 May 2019

GTX 680M SLI has a 616.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years.

The GeForce GTX 680M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
GeForce GTX 680M SLI
AMD Radeon 620
Radeon 620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 65 votes

Rate Radeon 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.