Radeon Pro 5600M vs GeForce GTX 675M

Place in the ranking	634	236
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.45	33.06
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GF114	Navi 12
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	22 March 2012 (12 years ago)	15 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2560
Core clock speed	620 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1030 MHz
Number of transistors	1,950 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	39.68	164.8
Floating-point processing power	0.9523 TFLOPS	5.274 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	64	160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	770 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96.0 GB/s	394.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 675M 5.01

Pro 5600M 24.01
+379%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 675M 1927

Pro 5600M 9232
+379%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	48 −379%	230−240 +379%
Full HD	48 −379%	230−240 +379%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −267%	40−45 +267%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −390%	45−50 +390%
Elden Ring	12−14 −550%	75−80 +550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −393%	70−75 +393%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −267%	40−45 +267%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −390%	45−50 +390%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −395%	100−110 +395%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −425%	60−65 +425%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −253%	50−55 +253%
Valorant	12−14 −708%	95−100 +708%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −393%	70−75 +393%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −267%	40−45 +267%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −390%	45−50 +390%
Dota 2	16−18 −419%	80−85 +419%
Elden Ring	12−14 −550%	75−80 +550%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −213%	75−80 +213%
Fortnite	27−30 −321%	120−130 +321%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −395%	100−110 +395%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −419%	80−85 +419%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −425%	60−65 +425%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −256%	150−160 +256%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −253%	50−55 +253%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −381%	75−80 +381%
Valorant	12−14 −708%	95−100 +708%
World of Tanks	102 −149%	250−260 +149%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −393%	70−75 +393%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −267%	40−45 +267%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −390%	45−50 +390%
Dota 2	16−18 −419%	80−85 +419%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −213%	75−80 +213%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −395%	100−110 +395%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −256%	150−160 +256%
Valorant	12−14 −708%	95−100 +708%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Elden Ring	6−7 −600%	40−45 +600%
Grand Theft Auto V	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −430%	170−180 +430%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −450%	21−24 +450%
World of Tanks	35−40 −344%	160−170 +344%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −586%	45−50 +586%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −122%	20−22 +122%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −400%	20−22 +400%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −527%	65−70 +527%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −800%	60−65 +800%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −1275%	55−60 +1275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Valorant	14−16 −357%	60−65 +357%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −141%	40−45 +141%
Elden Ring	2−3 −850%	18−20 +850%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −156%	40−45 +156%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −421%	70−75 +421%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −400%	14−16 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −156%	40−45 +156%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −525%	24−27 +525%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Dota 2	16−18 −141%	40−45 +141%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −540%	30−35 +540%
Fortnite	4−5 −650%	30−33 +650%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −825%	35−40 +825%
Valorant	5−6 −520%	30−35 +520%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2

21−24

+0%

21−24

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

21−24

+0%

21−24

+0%

This is how GTX 675M and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:

Pro 5600M is 379% faster in 900p
Pro 5600M is 379% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5600M is 1700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro 5600M is ahead in 61 test (97%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.01	24.01
Recency	22 March 2012	15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	50 Watt

Pro 5600M has a 379.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 675M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.