Radeon Pro 5300M vs GeForce GTX 675M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675M with Radeon Pro 5300M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 675M
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
5.00

Pro 5300M outperforms GTX 675M by a whopping 209% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking627344
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.4912.65
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGF114Navi 14
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)13 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841280
Core clock speed620 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1250 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate39.68100.0
Floating-point processing power0.9523 TFLOPS3.2 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 675M 5.00
Pro 5300M 15.43
+209%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 675M 1927
Pro 5300M 5952
+209%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p48
−192%
140−150
+192%
Full HD48
−192%
140−150
+192%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−182%
30−35
+182%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−227%
35−40
+227%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−200%
40−45
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−223%
100−105
+223%
Hitman 3 10−12
−164%
27−30
+164%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−144%
75−80
+144%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−342%
50−55
+342%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−223%
40−45
+223%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−71.7%
75−80
+71.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−182%
30−35
+182%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−227%
35−40
+227%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−200%
40−45
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−223%
100−105
+223%
Hitman 3 10−12
−164%
27−30
+164%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−144%
75−80
+144%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−342%
50−55
+342%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−223%
40−45
+223%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−106%
35−40
+106%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−71.7%
75−80
+71.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−182%
30−35
+182%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−227%
35−40
+227%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−223%
100−105
+223%
Hitman 3 10−12
−164%
27−30
+164%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−144%
75−80
+144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−106%
35−40
+106%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−71.7%
75−80
+71.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−223%
40−45
+223%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−200%
14−16
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−325%
16−18
+325%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−636%
80−85
+636%
Hitman 3 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−182%
30−35
+182%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−178%
24−27
+178%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Hitman 3 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−1014%
75−80
+1014%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 3−4
Far Cry 5 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how GTX 675M and Pro 5300M compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5300M is 192% faster in 900p
  • Pro 5300M is 192% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5300M is 1400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 5300M is ahead in 68 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.00 15.43
Recency 22 March 2012 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 85 Watt

Pro 5300M has a 208.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 17.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5300M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 675M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
GeForce GTX 675M
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 21 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 675M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 169 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.