Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 670MX

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 670MX and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 670MX
2012
3 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
5.12
+66.8%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013
System shared System shared + 128 MB eDRAM, 45 Watt
3.07

GTX 670MX outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking626769
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.717.06
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameGK104Haswell GT3e
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 October 2012 (12 years ago)27 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960320
Core clock speed600 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate48.0848.00
Floating-point processing power1.154 TFLOPS0.768 TFLOPS
ROPs244
TMUs8040

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System shared + 128 MB eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount3 GBSystem shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth67.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.3
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 670MX 5.12
+66.8%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 3.07

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 670MX 1970
+66.9%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 1180

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 670MX 3587
+86.5%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 1923

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 670MX 14530
+67.2%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 8692

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 670MX 2371
+71.7%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 1381

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GTX 670MX 34
+64.9%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 21

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
+122%
18
−122%
4K10−12
+42.9%
7
−42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Elden Ring 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Valorant 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Dota 2 16−18
+467%
3
−467%
Elden Ring 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+47.1%
16−18
−47.1%
Fortnite 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+240%
5
−240%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+53.6%
27−30
−53.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+113%
8
−113%
Valorant 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
World of Tanks 96
+84.6%
52
−84.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Dota 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+47.1%
16−18
−47.1%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+53.6%
27−30
−53.6%
Valorant 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Elden Ring 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+50%
21−24
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
World of Tanks 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Valorant 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Elden Ring 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Valorant 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

This is how GTX 670MX and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 670MX is 122% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 670MX is 43% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 670MX is 1200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 670MX is ahead in 56 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.12 3.07
Recency 1 October 2012 27 May 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 45 Watt

GTX 670MX has a 66.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 670MX is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
GeForce GTX 670MX
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 51 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 670MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 164 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.