Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GTX 670MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 670MX with Iris Pro Graphics 6200, including specs and performance data.

GTX 670MX
2012
3 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
5.06
+28.1%

GTX 670MX outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 6200 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking622690
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.8719.00
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameGK104Broadwell GT3e
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 October 2012 (12 years ago)5 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960384
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate48.0852.80
Floating-point processing power1.154 TFLOPS0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs246
TMUs8048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount3 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth67.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 670MX 5.06
+28.1%
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 3.95

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 670MX 1951
+28.1%
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 1523

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 670MX 3587
+29.7%
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 2766

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 670MX 2371
+36.5%
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 1737

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD39
+30%
30−35
−30%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+39.1%
21−24
−39.1%
Hitman 3 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+9.5%
40−45
−9.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+39.1%
21−24
−39.1%
Hitman 3 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+9.5%
40−45
−9.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+39.1%
21−24
−39.1%
Hitman 3 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+9.5%
40−45
−9.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Hitman 3 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

This is how GTX 670MX and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 670MX is 30% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 670MX is 175% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 670MX is ahead in 58 tests (92%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.06 3.95
Recency 1 October 2012 5 September 2014
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

GTX 670MX has a 28.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Pro Graphics 6200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 670MX is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 670MX is a notebook card while Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
GeForce GTX 670MX
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 50 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 670MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 85 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.