GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs GTX 660M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660M with GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2, including specs and performance data.

GTX 660M
2012
1 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
3.74

GTS 450 Rev. 2 outperforms GTX 660M by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking700661
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.403.00
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGK107GF116
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)15 March 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed835 MHz783 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,270 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt106 Watt
Texture fill rate30.4025.06
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS0.6013 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz902 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.0 GB/s57.73 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p32
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Full HD34
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
1200p38
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Hitman 3 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Hitman 3 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Hitman 3 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how GTX 660M and GTS 450 Rev. 2 compete in popular games:

  • GTS 450 Rev. 2 is 9% faster in 900p
  • GTS 450 Rev. 2 is 18% faster in 1080p
  • GTS 450 Rev. 2 is 5% faster in 1200p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.74 4.41
Recency 22 March 2012 15 March 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 106 Watt

GTX 660M has an age advantage of 1 year, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 112% lower power consumption.

GTS 450 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has a 17.9% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660M is a notebook card while GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
GeForce GTX 660M
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 210 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 39 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.