T600 vs Quadro 4000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 4000M with T600, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 4000M
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
3.37

T600 outperforms 4000M by a whopping 397% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking728319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.32no data
Power efficiency2.4330.21
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF104TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date22 February 2011 (13 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336640
Core clock speed475 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1335 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate26.6053.40
Floating-point processing power0.6384 TFLOPS1.709 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs5640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed625 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 4000M 3.37
T600 16.75
+397%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 4000M 1302
T600 6463
+396%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro 4000M 10722
T600 344838
+3116%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro 4000M 2092
T600 8694
+316%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro 4000M 5212
T600 27808
+434%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD71
+29.1%
55
−29.1%
1440p4−5
−500%
24
+500%
4K4−5
−450%
22
+450%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−333%
24−27
+333%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−280%
35−40
+280%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−325%
30−35
+325%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−333%
24−27
+333%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−457%
35−40
+457%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−463%
100−110
+463%
Hitman 3 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−246%
80−85
+246%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−1040%
55−60
+1040%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−475%
45−50
+475%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−108%
80−85
+108%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−280%
35−40
+280%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−325%
30−35
+325%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−333%
24−27
+333%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−457%
35−40
+457%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−463%
100−110
+463%
Hitman 3 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−246%
80−85
+246%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−1040%
55−60
+1040%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−475%
45−50
+475%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−292%
51
+292%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−160%
35−40
+160%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−108%
80−85
+108%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−280%
35−40
+280%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−325%
30−35
+325%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−333%
24−27
+333%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−457%
35−40
+457%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−463%
100−110
+463%
Hitman 3 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−62.5%
39
+62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−246%
45
+246%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−80%
27
+80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−108%
80−85
+108%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−475%
45−50
+475%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−433%
30−35
+433%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 90−95
Hitman 3 8−9
−150%
20−22
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−238%
27
+238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−410%
100−110
+410%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−300%
27−30
+300%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 3−4
Far Cry 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32
+0%
32
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
+0%
18
+0%

This is how Quadro 4000M and T600 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro 4000M is 29% faster in 1080p
  • T600 is 500% faster in 1440p
  • T600 is 450% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T600 is 2200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T600 is ahead in 62 tests (89%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.37 16.75
Recency 22 February 2011 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 40 Watt

T600 has a 397% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The T600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 4000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 4000M is a mobile workstation card while T600 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
Quadro 4000M
NVIDIA T600
T600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 33 votes

Rate Quadro 4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 679 votes

Rate T600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.