GeForce GTX 1630 vs GTX 580

Place in the ranking	401	385
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.01	no data
Power efficiency	3.39	11.93
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GF110	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	9 November 2010 (13 years ago)	28 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	512
Core clock speed	772 MHz	1740 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	244 Watt	75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	49.41	57.12
Floating-point processing power	1.581 TFLOPS	1.828 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	16
TMUs	64	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0 x 16	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	267 mm	145 mm
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1536 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2004 MHz (4008 data rate)	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.4 GB/s	96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 580 11.94

GTX 1630 12.92
+8.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 580 4608

GTX 1630 4984
+8.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	54 −1.9%	55−60 +1.9%
Full HD	96 −4.2%	100−110 +4.2%
1200p	78 −2.6%	80−85 +2.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

5.20

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

+0%

18−20
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −7.1%	30−33 +7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −7.1%	30−33 +7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −6.1%	35−40 +6.1%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −2.6%	80−85 +2.6%
Hitman 3	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −3.2%	65−70 +3.2%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −2.6%	40−45 +2.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −6.1%	35−40 +6.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −1.4%	70−75 +1.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −7.1%	30−33 +7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −7.1%	30−33 +7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −6.1%	35−40 +6.1%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −2.6%	80−85 +2.6%
Hitman 3	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −3.2%	65−70 +3.2%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −2.6%	40−45 +2.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −6.1%	35−40 +6.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −1.4%	70−75 +1.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −7.1%	30−33 +7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −7.1%	30−33 +7.1%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −2.6%	80−85 +2.6%
Hitman 3	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −3.2%	65−70 +3.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −1.4%	70−75 +1.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−6.1%

35−40
+6.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −4.3%	24−27 +4.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −5.3%	60−65 +5.3%
Hitman 3	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 −8.1%	80−85 +8.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20
+5.6%

18−20

−5.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Hitman 3	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12
+10%

10−11

−10%

This is how GTX 580 and GTX 1630 compete in popular games:

GTX 1630 is 2% faster in 900p
GTX 1630 is 4% faster in 1080p
GTX 1630 is 3% faster in 1200p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.94	12.92
Recency	9 November 2010	28 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount	1536 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	244 Watt	75 Watt

GTX 1630 has a 8.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 225.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 580 and GeForce GTX 1630.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.