T400 4 GB vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 560M SLI with T400 4 GB, including specs and performance data.

GTX 560M SLI
2011
100 Watt
6.48

T400 4 GB outperforms GTX 560M SLI by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking570457
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.5222.68
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameN12E-GSTU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2011 (13 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed775 MHz420 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rateno data34.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.094 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data3x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
Hitman 3 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−47.1%
75−80
+47.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
Hitman 3 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−47.1%
75−80
+47.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
Hitman 3 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−47.1%
75−80
+47.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Hitman 3 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−46.3%
60−65
+46.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Hitman 3 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.48 9.76
Recency 6 January 2011 6 May 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 30 Watt

T400 4 GB has a 50.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The T400 4 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560M SLI is a notebook card while T400 4 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M SLI
GeForce GTX 560M SLI
NVIDIA T400 4 GB
T400 4 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 560M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 57 votes

Rate T400 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.