Playstation 3 RSX vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking507not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.69no data
Power efficiency2.73no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGF110RSX-CXD2991
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 November 2011 (12 years ago)11 November 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448no data
Core clock speed732 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt81 Watt
Texture fill rate40.99no data
Floating-point processing power1.312 TFLOPSno data
ROPs40no data
TMUs56no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1280 MBno data
Memory bus width320 Bitno data
Memory clock speed950 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth152.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6ES 1.1
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 November 2011 11 November 2006
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 81 Watt

GTX 560 Ti 448 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

Playstation 3 RSX, on the other hand, has 159.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and Playstation 3 RSX. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX
Playstation 3 RSX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 28 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 80 votes

Rate Playstation 3 RSX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.