Radeon R7 360 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and Radeon R7 360, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GTX 560 Ti 448 outperforms R7 360 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 507 | 515 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.61 | 4.09 |
| Power efficiency | 2.71 | 5.57 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) |
| GPU code name | GF110 | Tobago |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | no data | reference |
| Release date | 29 November 2011 (12 years ago) | 18 June 2015 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $289 | $109 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
R7 360 has 154% better value for money than GTX 560 Ti 448.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 448 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 732 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1000 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 210 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 40.99 | 50.40 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.312 TFLOPS | 1.613 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40 | 16 |
| TMUs | 56 | 48 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | no data | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 165 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | - | + |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Eyefinity | - | + |
| Number of Eyefinity displays | no data | 6 |
| HDMI | + | + |
| DisplayPort support | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| CrossFire | - | + |
| FreeSync | - | + |
| PowerTune | - | + |
| TrueAudio | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
| DDMA audio | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX® 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | + |
| Mantle | - | + |
| CUDA | 2.0 | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.21 | 8.05 |
| Recency | 29 November 2011 | 18 June 2015 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 210 Watt | 100 Watt |
GTX 560 Ti 448 has a 2% higher aggregate performance score.
R7 360, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 110% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and Radeon R7 360.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
