Radeon RX 6750 XT vs GeForce GTX 470

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 470 and Radeon RX 6750 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 470
2010
1280 MB GDDR5, 215 Watt
8.06

RX 6750 XT outperforms GTX 470 by a whopping 570% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking51746
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.3250.78
Power efficiency2.5814.86
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF100Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date26 March 2010 (14 years ago)3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 $549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6750 XT has 3747% better value for money than GTX 470.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4482560
Core clock speed607 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2600 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt250 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate34.05416.0
Floating-point processing power1.089 TFLOPS13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs4064
TMUs56160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB12 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1674 MHz (3348 data rate)2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth133.9 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMI1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 470 8.06
RX 6750 XT 54.01
+570%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 470 3106
RX 6750 XT 20818
+570%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 470 4342
RX 6750 XT 48327
+1013%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 470 16753
RX 6750 XT 104004
+521%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 470 2758
RX 6750 XT 37609
+1264%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 470 25757
RX 6750 XT 170993
+564%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p55
−536%
350−400
+536%
Full HD64
−155%
163
+155%
1200p53
−560%
350−400
+560%
1440p12−14
−608%
85
+608%
4K7−8
−600%
49
+600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.453.37
1440p29.086.46
4K49.8611.20

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1169%
165
+1169%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
−460%
110−120
+460%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−755%
90−95
+755%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−613%
170−180
+613%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−550%
100−110
+550%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−877%
127
+877%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−483%
100−110
+483%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−465%
130−140
+465%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−306%
210−220
+306%
Hitman 3 16−18
−606%
110−120
+606%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−352%
200−210
+352%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−525%
150−160
+525%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−405%
110−120
+405%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−685%
210−220
+685%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−153%
140−150
+153%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
−460%
110−120
+460%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−755%
90−95
+755%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−613%
170−180
+613%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−550%
100−110
+550%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−738%
109
+738%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−483%
100−110
+483%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−465%
130−140
+465%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−306%
210−220
+306%
Hitman 3 16−18
−606%
110−120
+606%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−352%
200−210
+352%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−525%
150−160
+525%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−405%
110−120
+405%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−1026%
304
+1026%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−387%
110−120
+387%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−153%
140−150
+153%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
−460%
110−120
+460%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−755%
90−95
+755%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−550%
100−110
+550%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−654%
98
+654%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−483%
100−110
+483%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−306%
210−220
+306%
Hitman 3 16−18
−606%
110−120
+606%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−357%
210
+357%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−863%
260
+863%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−487%
135
+487%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−71.9%
98
+71.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−405%
110−120
+405%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−600%
110−120
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−592%
80−85
+592%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−663%
60−65
+663%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1500%
60−65
+1500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−700%
60−65
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1400%
60
+1400%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−600%
60−65
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−758%
260−270
+758%
Hitman 3 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−829%
158
+829%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−1160%
126
+1160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−2557%
186
+2557%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1157%
85−90
+1157%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−339%
220−230
+339%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−557%
90−95
+557%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−743%
55−60
+743%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−634%
210−220
+634%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1167%
75−80
+1167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1480%
79
+1480%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1167%
35−40
+1167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−850%
35−40
+850%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2500%
26
+2500%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−789%
80−85
+789%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−3200%
99
+3200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−1267%
41
+1267%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−550%
50−55
+550%

This is how GTX 470 and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 536% faster in 900p
  • RX 6750 XT is 155% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 560% faster in 1200p
  • RX 6750 XT is 608% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 3200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6750 XT surpassed GTX 470 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.06 54.01
Recency 26 March 2010 3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 470 has 16.3% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 570.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 860% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 470 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
GeForce GTX 470
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 317 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2582 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.