Radeon RX 470 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Place in the ranking	157	299
Place by popularity	33	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	44.95	9.60
Power efficiency	19.32	14.80
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	TU116	Ellesmere
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	22 February 2019 (5 years ago)	4 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$279	$549.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti has 368% better value for money than RX 470 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	2048
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	926 MHz
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	1074 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	85 Watt
Texture fill rate	169.9	137.5
Floating-point processing power	5.437 TFLOPS	4.399 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	32
TMUs	96	128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti 33.47
+84.2%

RX 470 Mobile 18.17

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 Ti 16024
+49.5%

RX 470 Mobile 10715

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	102 +85.5%	55−60 −85.5%
1440p	60 +100%	30−35 −100%
4K	40 +90.5%	21−24 −90.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.74	10.00
1440p	4.65	18.33
4K	6.98	26.19

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

78
+160%

30−33

−160%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	86 +105%	40−45 −105%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	74 +131%	30−35 −131%
Battlefield 5	130 +110%	60−65 −110%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95 +150%	35−40 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	71 +137%	30−33 −137%
Far Cry 5	104 +136%	40−45 −136%
Far Cry New Dawn	112 +120%	50−55 −120%
Forza Horizon 4	231 +95.8%	110−120 −95.8%
Hitman 3	70−75 +89.2%	35−40 −89.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +57.6%	90−95 −57.6%
Metro Exodus	134 +106%	65−70 −106%
Red Dead Redemption 2	119 +133%	50−55 −133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	171 +176%	60−65 −176%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +34.8%	85−90 −34.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	122 +190%	40−45 −190%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55 +71.9%	30−35 −71.9%
Battlefield 5	121 +95.2%	60−65 −95.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85 +124%	35−40 −124%
Cyberpunk 2077	57 +90%	30−33 −90%
Far Cry 5	82 +86.4%	40−45 −86.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	79 +54.9%	50−55 −54.9%
Forza Horizon 4	218 +84.7%	110−120 −84.7%
Hitman 3	70−75 +89.2%	35−40 −89.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +57.6%	90−95 −57.6%
Metro Exodus	114 +75.4%	65−70 −75.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	89 +74.5%	50−55 −74.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	127 +105%	60−65 −105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 +62.8%	40−45 −62.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +34.8%	85−90 −34.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	53 +26.2%	40−45 −26.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50 +56.3%	30−35 −56.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70 +84.2%	35−40 −84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	46 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
Far Cry 5	61 +38.6%	40−45 −38.6%
Forza Horizon 4	97 −21.6%	110−120 +21.6%
Hitman 3	70−75 +89.2%	35−40 −89.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	102 +10.9%	90−95 −10.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110 +77.4%	60−65 −77.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	62 +44.2%	40−45 −44.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +34.8%	85−90 −34.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

97
+90.2%

50−55

−90.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	75 +108%	35−40 −108%
Far Cry New Dawn	54 +86.2%	27−30 −86.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	41 +116%	18−20 −116%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	36 +112%	16−18 −112%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	52 +148%	21−24 −148%
Cyberpunk 2077	27 +145%	10−12 −145%
Far Cry 5	41 +86.4%	21−24 −86.4%
Forza Horizon 4	202 +94.2%	100−110 −94.2%
Hitman 3	40−45 +90.9%	21−24 −90.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75 +97.4%	35−40 −97.4%
Metro Exodus	65 +85.7%	35−40 −85.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	78 +105%	35−40 −105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +119%	21−24 −119%
Watch Dogs: Legion	170−180 +54%	110−120 −54%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65
+110%

30−35

−110%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	36 +89.5%	18−20 −89.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	29 +107%	14−16 −107%
Hitman 3	27−30 +92.9%	14−16 −92.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +68%	95−100 −68%
Metro Exodus	46 +130%	20−22 −130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	43 +126%	18−20 −126%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	25 +127%	10−12 −127%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	19 +111%	9−10 −111%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	25 +150%	10−11 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 +175%	4−5 −175%
Far Cry 5	20 +100%	10−11 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	51 +96.2%	24−27 −96.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	43 +105%	21−24 −105%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

44
+159%

16−18

−159%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and RX 470 Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 1660 Ti is 85% faster in 1080p
GTX 1660 Ti is 100% faster in 1440p
GTX 1660 Ti is 90% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti is 190% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 470 Mobile is 22% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1660 Ti is ahead in 71 test (99%)
RX 470 Mobile is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.47	18.17
Recency	22 February 2019	4 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	85 Watt