Radeon Pro W6600M vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Place in performance ranking	190	136
Place by popularity	51	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	27.07	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	TU116	Navi 23
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	29 October 2019 (4 years ago)	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price	$206	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	1792
Core clock speed	1530 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1725 MHz	2034 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	90 Watt
Texture fill rate	138.0	325.1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon Pro W6600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	+	no data
Multi Monitor	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 SUPER 26.30

Pro W6600M 35.08
+33.4%

Radeon Pro W6600M outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1650 SUPER 10156

Pro W6600M 13549
+33.4%

Radeon Pro W6600M outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 33% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	69 −30.4%	90−95 +30.4%
1440p	34 −32.4%	45−50 +32.4%
4K	21 −28.6%	27−30 +28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	53	no data
Battlefield 5	85−90	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	50	no data
Far Cry 5	60−65	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70	no data
Forza Horizon 4	110−120	no data
Hitman 3	62	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	157	no data
Metro Exodus	69	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	84	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	121	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	71	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	26	no data
Battlefield 5	85−90	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	40	no data
Far Cry 5	60−65	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70	no data
Forza Horizon 4	110−120	no data
Hitman 3	59	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110	no data
Metro Exodus	82	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	74	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	101	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	180	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	15	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	34	no data
Far Cry 5	60−65	no data
Forza Horizon 4	110−120	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	83	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	83	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	21	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	61	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	13	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	20	no data
Far Cry 5	54	no data
Forza Horizon 4	50−55	no data
Hitman 3	34	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	60	no data
Metro Exodus	55	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	14	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24	no data
Hitman 3	34	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	19	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	32	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	3	no data
Far Cry 5	14−16	no data
Forza Horizon 4	35−40	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	33	no data
Metro Exodus	28	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	8	no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

no data

This is how GTX 1650 SUPER and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:

Pro W6600M is 30% faster in 1080p
Pro W6600M is 32% faster in 1440p
Pro W6600M is 29% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	26.30	35.08
Recency	29 October 2019	8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	90 Watt