ATI Radeon 9700 PRO X4 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking204not rated
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Power efficiency18.31no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameTU116R300
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 November 2019 (4 years ago)1 July 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed1530 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate138.02.600
Floating-point processing power4.416 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs808

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz310 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s19.84 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DVI
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 November 2019 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 150 nm

GTX 1650 SUPER has an age advantage of 17 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon 9700 PRO X4. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
ATI Radeon 9700 PRO X4
Radeon 9700 PRO X4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4645 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 PRO X4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.