ATI Radeon 9250 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 SUPER GTX 1650 TU116 GTX 1660 GTX 1660 Super GTX 1660 Ti
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
All-In-Wonder 9200 All-In-Wonder 9200 LE All-In-Wonder 9200 SE FireMV 2200 PCI Radeon 9200 Radeon 9200 LE Radeon 9200 PCI Radeon 9200 PRO Radeon 9200 SE Radeon 9200 SE PCI Radeon 9250 Radeon 9250 PCI

Contents

GTX 1650 SUPER GTX 1650 SUPER
ATI 9250 Radeon 9250

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2141541
Place by popularity48not in top-100
Power efficiency18.20no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameTU116RV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 November 2019 (5 years ago)1 March 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed1530 MHz240 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate138.00.96
Floating-point processing power4.416 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs804

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 SUPER 10164
+508100%
ATI 9250 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70no data
1440p36no data
4K23no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 61 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 63 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85 no data
Counter-Strike 2 48 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 47 no data
Forza Horizon 4 121 no data
Forza Horizon 5 75 no data
Metro Exodus 89 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 84 no data
Valorant 115 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85 no data
Counter-Strike 2 39 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 38 no data
Dota 2 138 no data
Far Cry 5 151 no data
Fortnite 130−140 no data
Forza Horizon 4 101 no data
Forza Horizon 5 75 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 103 no data
Metro Exodus 61 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90 no data
Valorant 100−110 no data
World of Tanks 260−270 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85 no data
Counter-Strike 2 35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 32 no data
Dota 2 191 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 83 no data
Forza Horizon 5 51 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170 no data
Valorant 100−110 no data

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 45 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 11 no data
World of Tanks 170−180 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 19 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 60 no data
Forza Horizon 5 54 no data
Metro Exodus 55 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45 no data
Valorant 70−75 no data

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Dota 2 45 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 45 no data
Metro Exodus 16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30 no data
Counter-Strike 2 2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5 no data
Dota 2 80 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Fortnite 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30 no data
Forza Horizon 5 39 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Pros & cons summary

Recency 22 November 2019 1 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 150 nm

GTX 1650 SUPER has an age advantage of 15 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon 9250. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
ATI Radeon 9250
Radeon 9250
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
ATI 9250 Radeon 9250
vs
R5 435 OEM Radeon R5 435 OEM
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
RTX 3050 6 GB GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
GeForce 940A GeForce 940A
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
GRID K240Q GRID K240Q
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
NVS 310 NVS 310
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
ATI HD 4550 Radeon HD 4550
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
9500 GT GeForce 9500 GT
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
8800 GTX GeForce 8800 GTX
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
ATI HD 3450 X2 Radeon HD 3450 X2
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
R4 Mobile Graphics Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
Pro Vega 64X Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 4865 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 54 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.