RTX A4500 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Ti with RTX A4500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 Ti
2017
11 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
48.17
+6.5%

GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX A4500 Mobile by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7078
Place by popularity41not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.83no data
Power efficiency13.2122.14
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP102GA104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date10 March 2017 (7 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35845888
Core clock speed1481 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt140 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature91 °Cno data
Texture fill rate354.4276.0
Floating-point processing power11.34 TFLOPS17.66 TFLOPS
ROPs8896
TMUs224184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount11 GB16 GB
Memory bus width352 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth484.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 Ti 48.17
+6.5%
RTX A4500 Mobile 45.22

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 Ti 18562
+6.5%
RTX A4500 Mobile 17424

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD132
+10%
120−130
−10%
1440p83
+10.7%
75−80
−10.7%
4K66
+10%
60−65
−10%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.30no data
1440p8.42no data
4K10.59no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+4300%
2−3
−4300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100
+3233%
3−4
−3233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85
+10.7%
75−80
−10.7%
Battlefield 5 162
+8%
150−160
−8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+4650%
2−3
−4650%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+4300%
2−3
−4300%
Far Cry 5 122
+10.9%
110−120
−10.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+17%
100−105
−17%
Forza Horizon 4 293
+8.5%
270−280
−8.5%
Hitman 3 100−110
+2450%
4−5
−2450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+2288%
8−9
−2288%
Metro Exodus 144
+10.8%
130−140
−10.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+9.5%
95−100
−9.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 215
+5275%
4−5
−5275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+396%
27−30
−396%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 145
+4733%
3−4
−4733%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85
+10.7%
75−80
−10.7%
Battlefield 5 147
+13.1%
130−140
−13.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+4650%
2−3
−4650%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+4300%
2−3
−4300%
Far Cry 5 96
+6.7%
90−95
−6.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 59
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Forza Horizon 4 284
+9.2%
260−270
−9.2%
Hitman 3 100−110
+2450%
4−5
−2450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+2288%
8−9
−2288%
Metro Exodus 144
+10.8%
130−140
−10.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+9.5%
95−100
−9.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 196
+4800%
4−5
−4800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+1000%
9−10
−1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+396%
27−30
−396%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 71
+2267%
3−4
−2267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85
+10.7%
75−80
−10.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 81
+3950%
2−3
−3950%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+4300%
2−3
−4300%
Far Cry 5 73
+12.3%
65−70
−12.3%
Forza Horizon 4 120
+9.1%
110−120
−9.1%
Hitman 3 100−110
+2450%
4−5
−2450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 153
+1813%
8−9
−1813%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 167
+4075%
4−5
−4075%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
+989%
9−10
−989%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+396%
27−30
−396%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 121
+10%
110−120
−10%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 108
+8%
100−105
−8%
Far Cry New Dawn 86
+7.5%
80−85
−7.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+12.7%
55−60
−12.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+12%
50−55
−12%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 62
+12.7%
55−60
−12.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 0−1
Far Cry 5 55
+10%
50−55
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 265
+10.4%
240−250
−10.4%
Hitman 3 65−70
+983%
6−7
−983%
Horizon Zero Dawn 118
+5800%
2−3
−5800%
Metro Exodus 88
+10%
80−85
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 123
+11.8%
110−120
−11.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+7.1%
70−75
−7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 210−220
+7%
200−210
−7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 98
+4800%
2−3
−4800%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 56
+12%
50−55
−12%
Far Cry New Dawn 69
+15%
60−65
−15%
Hitman 3 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+6.8%
190−200
−6.8%
Metro Exodus 60
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+10.8%
65−70
−10.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+3900%
1−2
−3900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 37
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Far Cry 5 31
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Forza Horizon 4 75
+7.1%
70−75
−7.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 72
+10.8%
65−70
−10.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 49
+2350%
2−3
−2350%

This is how GTX 1080 Ti and RTX A4500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Ti is 10% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Ti is 11% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Ti is 10% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1080 Ti is 5800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1080 Ti surpassed RTX A4500 Mobile in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 48.17 45.22
Recency 10 March 2017 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 140 Watt

GTX 1080 Ti has a 6.5% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 45.5% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 78.6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and RTX A4500 Mobile.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is a desktop card while RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 9996 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 17 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.