RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 1050

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 with RTX 6000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
13.06

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms GTX 1050 by a whopping 472% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking38915
Place by popularity15not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.347.14
Power efficiency11.9317.08
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP107AD102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)3 December 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 $6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1050 has 59% better value for money than RTX 6000 Ada Generation.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64018176
Core clock speed1290 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed1392 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt300 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate58.201,423
Floating-point processing power1.862 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs40568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Height4.38" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)300 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin
SLI-no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP2.2-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 13.06
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 74.76
+472%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 5032
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28801
+472%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 8571
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 70850
+727%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1050 32463
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 126448
+290%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 6797
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 36679
+440%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1050 17460
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 322743
+1748%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 1050 15623
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 246891
+1480%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
−321%
181
+321%
1440p20
−750%
170
+750%
4K21
−462%
118
+462%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.5337.56
1440p5.4539.99
4K5.1957.62

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 38
−295%
150−160
+295%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−529%
130−140
+529%
Battlefield 5 43
−447%
230−240
+447%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−362%
120−130
+362%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−290%
110−120
+290%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−400%
180−190
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−181%
240−250
+181%
Hitman 3 24−27
−416%
120−130
+416%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−288%
260−270
+288%
Metro Exodus 46
−237%
150−160
+237%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−242%
120−130
+242%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 52
−500%
300−350
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−110%
150−160
+110%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
−206%
150−160
+206%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−529%
130−140
+529%
Battlefield 5 35
−571%
230−240
+571%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−362%
120−130
+362%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
Far Cry 5 33
−255%
110−120
+255%
Far Cry New Dawn 16
−1025%
180−190
+1025%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−181%
240−250
+181%
Hitman 3 24−27
−416%
120−130
+416%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−288%
260−270
+288%
Metro Exodus 37
−319%
150−160
+319%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−242%
120−130
+242%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35
−791%
300−350
+791%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−397%
150−160
+397%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−110%
150−160
+110%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 15
−900%
150−160
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−529%
130−140
+529%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−362%
120−130
+362%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
Far Cry 5 23
−409%
110−120
+409%
Forza Horizon 4 34
−612%
240−250
+612%
Hitman 3 24−27
−416%
120−130
+416%
Horizon Zero Dawn 26
−915%
260−270
+915%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 31
−906%
300−350
+906%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−1200%
260
+1200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−110%
150−160
+110%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−242%
120−130
+242%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−564%
160−170
+564%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−460%
110−120
+460%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−569%
85−90
+569%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−840%
90−95
+840%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−486%
80−85
+486%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−460%
80−85
+460%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−317%
270−280
+317%
Hitman 3 16−18
−569%
100−110
+569%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−600%
180−190
+600%
Metro Exodus 25
−296%
99
+296%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
−1078%
210−220
+1078%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1585%
219
+1585%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−196%
240−250
+196%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−462%
110−120
+462%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−577%
85−90
+577%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−667%
65−70
+667%
Hitman 3 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−38.1%
87
+38.1%
Metro Exodus 12
−892%
110−120
+892%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−1127%
184
+1127%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−883%
55−60
+883%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−767%
50−55
+767%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−676%
130−140
+676%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−973%
110−120
+973%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−860%
45−50
+860%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−583%
80−85
+583%

This is how GTX 1050 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 321% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 750% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 462% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 1585% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 6000 Ada Generation surpassed GTX 1050 in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.06 74.76
Recency 25 October 2016 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt

GTX 1050 has 300% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 472.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 is a desktop card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
GeForce GTX 1050
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 5803 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 85 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.