RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with RTX 6000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.39

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms GTX 1050 Ti by a whopping 356% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking33115
Place by popularity5not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.027.14
Power efficiency14.9817.08
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP107AD102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)3 December 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 $6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1050 Ti has 96% better value for money than RTX 6000 Ada Generation.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76818176
Core clock speed1291 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed1392 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt300 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.821,423
Floating-point processing power2.138 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs48568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti 16.39
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 74.74
+356%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Ti 6317
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28801
+356%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Ti 9453
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 70850
+649%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Ti 7485
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 36679
+390%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1050 Ti 20723
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 323040
+1459%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 1050 Ti 19805
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 246891
+1147%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50
−262%
181
+262%
1440p29
−486%
170
+486%
4K24
−392%
118
+392%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.7837.56
1440p4.7939.99
4K5.7957.62

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
−213%
150−160
+213%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−389%
130−140
+389%
Battlefield 5 53
−343%
230−240
+343%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−264%
120−130
+264%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−208%
110−120
+208%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−309%
180−190
+309%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−130%
240−250
+130%
Hitman 3 30−35
−316%
120−130
+316%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−222%
260−270
+222%
Metro Exodus 56
−177%
150−160
+177%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−173%
120−130
+173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80
−290%
300−350
+290%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−86.6%
150−160
+86.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 64
−134%
150−160
+134%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−389%
130−140
+389%
Battlefield 5 44
−434%
230−240
+434%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−264%
120−130
+264%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%
Far Cry 5 35
−234%
110−120
+234%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
−339%
180−190
+339%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−130%
240−250
+130%
Hitman 3 30−35
−316%
120−130
+316%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−222%
260−270
+222%
Metro Exodus 46
−237%
150−160
+237%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−173%
120−130
+173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50
−524%
300−350
+524%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−318%
150−160
+318%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−86.6%
150−160
+86.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
−525%
150−160
+525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−389%
130−140
+389%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−264%
120−130
+264%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%
Far Cry 5 27
−333%
110−120
+333%
Forza Horizon 4 45
−438%
240−250
+438%
Hitman 3 30−35
−316%
120−130
+316%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45
−487%
260−270
+487%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 43
−626%
300−350
+626%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
−900%
260
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−86.6%
150−160
+86.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−173%
120−130
+173%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−419%
160−170
+419%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−348%
110−120
+348%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−444%
85−90
+444%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−571%
90−95
+571%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−356%
80−85
+356%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−342%
80−85
+342%
Forza Horizon 4 75
−261%
270−280
+261%
Hitman 3 18−20
−463%
100−110
+463%
Horizon Zero Dawn 32
−491%
180−190
+491%
Metro Exodus 29
−241%
99
+241%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
−607%
210−220
+607%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−1117%
219
+1117%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−142%
240−250
+142%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−337%
110−120
+337%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−450%
85−90
+450%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−475%
65−70
+475%
Hitman 3 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−4.8%
87
+4.8%
Metro Exodus 14
−750%
110−120
+750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−1050%
184
+1050%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−578%
60−65
+578%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−638%
55−60
+638%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−550%
50−55
+550%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Forza Horizon 4 20
−560%
130−140
+560%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−594%
110−120
+594%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−586%
45−50
+586%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−447%
80−85
+447%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 262% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 486% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 392% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 1117% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 6000 Ada Generation surpassed GTX 1050 Ti in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.39 74.74
Recency 25 October 2016 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti has 300% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 356% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a desktop card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 206911 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 84 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.