Radeon Pro W5700 vs Quadro RTX 6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 6000 and Radeon Pro W5700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 6000
2018
24 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
48.46
+26.1%

RTX 6000 outperforms Pro W5700 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking69120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.3244.38
Power efficiency12.7812.85
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameTU102Navi 10
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)19 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,299 $799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro W5700 has 734% better value for money than RTX 6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46082304
Core clock speed1440 MHz1243 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1930 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt205 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8277.9
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS8.893 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs288144
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm305 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 6000 48.46
+26.1%
Pro W5700 38.42

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 6000 18674
+26.1%
Pro W5700 14804

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 48.46 38.42
Recency 13 August 2018 19 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 205 Watt

RTX 6000 has a 26.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro W5700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 26.8% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W5700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000
AMD Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 130 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 95 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.