Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and Arc Graphics 130V, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
2018
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
13.86
+19.4%

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q outperforms Arc Graphics 130V by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking374413
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.67no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Xe² (2024)
GPU code nameGP107Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2018 (6 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7687
Core clock speed1152 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1417 MHz1850 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate68.02no data
Floating-point processing power2.177 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1752 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 13.86
+19.4%
Arc Graphics 130V 11.61

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 5339
+19.3%
Arc Graphics 130V 4474

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 8752
Arc Graphics 130V 9523
+8.8%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 7324
Arc Graphics 130V 8255
+12.7%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 2261
Arc Graphics 130V 3242
+43.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
+80.6%
31
−80.6%
4K18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 43
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Battlefield 5 46
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 48
+20%
40−45
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+21.3%
75−80
−21.3%
Hitman 3 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+20%
60−65
−20%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80
+23.1%
65−70
−23.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+25%
60−65
−25%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 61
+22%
50−55
−22%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Battlefield 5 41
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 36
+20%
30−33
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+21.3%
75−80
−21.3%
Hitman 3 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+20%
60−65
−20%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+25%
60−65
−25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%
Hitman 3 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+20%
60−65
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+25%
60−65
−25%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%
Hitman 3 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 29
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+22.9%
70−75
−22.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10
+25%
8−9
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
Hitman 3 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+23.6%
55−60
−23.6%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
+40%
5−6
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+25%
16−18
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and Arc Graphics 130V compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 81% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 29% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.86 11.61
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q has a 19.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 130V, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 130V in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 103 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 7 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.