Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 GTX 1050 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti GTX 1060 3 GB GTX 1060 5 GB GTX 1060 6 GB GTX 1070 GTX 1070 Ti GTX 1080 GTX 1080 Ti
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Radeon Pro WX 4130 Radeon Pro WX 4150 Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile Radeon Pro WX 7130 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB with Radeon Pro WX 3200, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 3 GB
2018
3 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
13.17
+110%

GTX 1050 3 GB outperforms Pro WX 3200 by a whopping 110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 1050 3 GB GTX 1050 3 GB
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking387578
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.43
Power efficiency12.036.61
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP107Polaris 23
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date21 May 2018 (6 years ago)2 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768640
Core clock speed1392 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speed1518 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate72.8634.62
Floating-point processing power2.332 TFLOPS1.385 TFLOPS
ROPs2416
TMUs4832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length145 mmno data
Width2-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth84.1 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 3 GB 13.17
+110%
Pro WX 3200 6.27

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 3 GB 5075
+110%
Pro WX 3200 2414

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
+100%
20
−100%
4K16−18
+100%
8
−100%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data9.95
4Kno data24.88

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 24
+0%
24
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 14
+0%
14
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Hitman 3 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+0%
5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 3 GB and Pro WX 3200 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 3 GB is 100% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 3 GB is 100% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 71 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 13.17 6.27
Recency 21 May 2018 2 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 65 Watt

GTX 1050 3 GB has a 110% higher aggregate performance score.

Pro WX 3200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 15.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB is a desktop card while Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1050 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
vs
GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 1050
Pro WX 3200 Radeon Pro WX 3200
vs
Pro WX 4130 Radeon Pro WX 4130
GTX 1050 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
vs
GTX 1630 GeForce GTX 1630
GTX 1050 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
vs
RX 580 2048SP Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GTX 1050 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 940 Iris Plus Graphics 940
GTX 1050 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
vs
GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650
GTX 1050 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
vs
GTX 1660 GeForce GTX 1660
GTX 1050 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q
GTX 1050 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
vs
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Adreno 680
GTX 1050 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
vs
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GTX 1050 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
vs
Qualcomm Adreno 685 Adreno 685
GTX 1050 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
vs
GeForce MX330 GeForce MX330
GTX 1050 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
vs
Playstation 5 GPU Playstation 5 GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 345 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 84 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.