GeForce FX Go 5200 vs GTS 450

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking723not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.57no data
Power efficiency2.24no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)no data
GPU code nameGF106NV31M
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 September 2010 (14 years ago)1 March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1925
Core clock speed783 MHz1 MHz
Boost clock speedno data300 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)106 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature100 °Cno data
Texture fill rate25.06no data
Floating-point processing power0.6013 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length210 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1804 (3608 data rate) MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.7 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMini HDMITwo Dual Link DVIno data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)DDR
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.2no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTS 450 1323
+16438%
FX Go 5200 8

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 September 2010 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

GTS 450 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTS 450 and GeForce FX Go 5200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 450 is a desktop card while GeForce FX Go 5200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
GeForce GTS 450
NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200
GeForce FX Go 5200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 2628 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 17 votes

Rate GeForce FX Go 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.